- May 11, 2015
- 17,420
- 3,593
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
I am just looking to find the right word to use. The words we use are very important and they have to be exact.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I am just looking to find the right word to use. The words we use are very important and they have to be exact.I'd agree it was allegory, what confuses me is your interpretation which seems to change on a daily basis.
If you'd like to critique the methodology or peer review of a certain research study or discipline, by all means, go on. I'm curious about how you came to this conclusion.Actually the liberals are anti-science. They pervert Science and try to use Counterfeit Science as a tool for their agenda and propaganda. Although I tend to agree with your premise that true science is neither liberal or conservative.
If you'd like to critique the methodology or peer review of a certain research study or discipline, by all means, go on. I'm curious about how you came to this conclusion.
I do not reject true science at all,
Of course there are counterfeits and we need to be able to discern what is true and what is not. If your wife were to buy a Gucci purse would she be happy if it turned out to be a counterfeit?
Wrong again.You reject the theory of evolution, and you do so because of your religious beliefs.
Of course that is how you determine a counterfeit by looking at an original.The problem is that you determine what is counterfeit based on what matches your already held religious beliefs.
Wrong again.
Of course that is how you determine a counterfeit by looking at an original.
You can not change the Bible. The Bible was written over 3500 years ago. Yet the Bible has a fresh and new application for each and every generation. "The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God stands forever." Isaiah 40:8
Your belief would have us accept that science is to be used to judge the truthfulness of scripture. YOU know the earth is old. YOU know evolutionism happened and created mankind. Your science tells you so...
One of the many reasons was presented in this post. You can reply there as this question is not about pangea.Then prove me wrong. Give me a scientific reason as to why you reject the theory of evolution.
Genesis is an allegorical story. Genesis is also literal truth.Genesis has to be made into an allegorical story.
Science can not show that Jesus was not resurrected on the third day. Some things we accept on faith and the resurrection is a part of the statement of faith. Science is limited. All of the Bible is absolute truth. Still science is limited in what Science can prove is true.The "scientific" generation with its new application would tell us a dead Christ could not have risen on day 3
One of the many reasons was presented in this post. You can reply there as this question is not about pangea.
Science can not show that Jesus was not resurrected on the third day. Some things we accept on faith and the resurrection is a part of the statement of faith. Science is limited. All of the Bible is absolute truth. Still science is limited in what Science can prove is true.
Genesis is an allegorical story. Genesis is also literal truth.
Science can not show that Jesus was not resurrected on the third day. Some things we accept on faith and the resurrection is a part of the statement of faith. Science is limited. All of the Bible is absolute truth. Still science is limited in what Science can prove is true.
NEXT
Really by liberal I mean the atheists. Science shows us that the Bible is accurate and true. SO in order to be an atheist then you have to reject true science.If you'd like to critique the methodology or peer review of a certain research study or discipline, by all means, go on. I'm curious about how you came to this conclusion.
This isn't a response to my question. What led you to your conclusion? With what methodologies or peer review processes do you take issue, and why? I'm genuinely curious.Really by liberal I mean the atheists. Science shows us that the Bible is accurate and true. SO in order to be an atheist then you have to reject true science.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?