Stop Abortion!!

[agent47]

Ohhh snap.

 

[-~Truth_N_Trust~-]

I'm pro abortionist, but I would take adoptions side over abortion any day. I don't see whats wrong with removing something which is not sentient and has no nervous system, from someone who doesn't want it. If you have a house and it gets infested with ants, you lay out poison for them, and don't think twice. It's the same thing.

wow.

 

[-~Truth_N_Trust~-]

Not all forms of contraception are fool proof. Condoms burst, the pill sometimes doesn't work. You can't predict these things.

and you know this. We all know this. So it's not an excuse!

You do realize that nothing but abstinence is foolproof?

Exactly.

 

[Trashionista]

and you know this. We all know this. So it's not an excuse!


Exactly.

So, in a committed relationship, the two parties are expected to never have sex?

Good luck spreading that viewpoint.

 

[Calliso]

So, in a committed relationship, the two parties are expected to never have sex?

Good luck spreading that viewpoint.

I was just about to ask that lol. I mean for unmarried couples maybe but married couples? That could end up with a very unhappy marriage.

 

[-~Truth_N_Trust~-]

no, that's not my point. In a married couple you understand that there is no 100% foolproof contraception. 'oops' is not an excuse. You can't predict, but you can prepare incase.

 

[Calliso]

no, that's not my point. In a married couple you understand that there is no 100% foolproof contraception. 'oops' is not an excuse. You can't predict, but you can prepare incase.

Yeah true, I agree with you for the most part. However if a person in a marriage gets pregnant I donlt see anything wrong with them getting a very early abortion if they are not ready to raise achild. But I imagine you would disagree lol.

 

[-~Truth_N_Trust~-]

Yeah true, I agree with you for the most part. However if a person in a marriage gets pregnant I donlt see anything wrong with them getting a very early abortion if they are not ready to raise achild. But I imagine you would disagree lol.

yeah I'll disagree!

 

[lincolngreen50]

Yeah true, I agree with you for the most part. However if a person in a marriage gets pregnant I donlt see anything wrong with them getting a very early abortion if they are not ready to raise achild. But I imagine you would disagree lol.

Killing for convenience.
`Please do not deny the little ones to come to me`Jesus Christ.

 

[Trashionista]

Killing for convenience.
`Please do not deny the little ones to come to me`Jesus Christ.

It is for convenience, but it isn't the same as killing.

 

[texastig]

It is for convenience, but it isn't the same as killing.

Quirk, are you a Christian?
Thanks,
TT

 

[Trashionista]

Quirk, are you a Christian?
Thanks,
TT

Must you ask the same question of me in every abortion discussion?

 

[texastig]

Must you ask the same question of me in every abortion discussion?

I don't remember getting an answer.
Thanks,
TT

 

[lincolngreen50]

In your opinion.

Neither is a car blowing CO2 into the atmosphere. Or a smokestack doing the same thing.

You don't think people die from pollution?

Then again, I forgot. Unwanted fetus' are worth so much more.

Why do you try to justify what cannot be justified?
Why are you belittling a life,a personality ,a unique being that was ordained and made by God.
God makes everything,man destroys most things.
God weeps while His children sweeps sin under the carpet.
So what would you say if the child was aborted against the mothers will?
Is that a crime then?
Why should a woman use abortion as a birth control device?

 

[texastig]

I don't remember getting an answer.
Thanks,
TT

Quirk, I'm sorry, I might of missed your answer.
Thanks,
TT

 

[Trashionista]

Why do you try to justify what cannot be justified?

I never said pollution can be justified.

Why are you belittling a life,a personality ,a unique being that was ordained and made by God.

Pollution = death. Why aren't you out there fighting for factory worker rights in developing and third world countries if fighting for the Right to Life is what God has ordained you to do? You can't have it both ways.

To belittle the effects of pollution on the already living human population, to make some cheap point about abortion somehow being worse may not be wrong, but it makes you look like a complete hypocrite.

God makes everything,man destroys most things.

Well, I disagree on the first part. But I would agree in many instances on the second part.

God weeps while His children sweeps sin under the carpet.

You don't think God could be weeping over pollution and global warming as well?

So what would you say if the child was aborted against the mothers will?

That's despicable. As it goes against a woman's right to control her body. Whether she goes the abortion route of giving birth route.

Is that a crime then?

Yes. There's been an example of a woman in China posted in this very section, and if I remember correctly, most pro-choicers felt it to be a crime.

If you're going to a lobby a cheap insult, at least make sure the insinuation that we're heartless and cold witches who want the government to abort women's fetus' without consent, at least make sure its plausible. Because comments in said thread would prove you wrong.

Why should a woman use abortion as a birth control device?

Why shouldn't she? You haven't given any real reason besides "God or my religion or my belief system says that is wrong."

 

[lincolngreen50]

I never said pollution can be justified.



Pollution = death. Why aren't you out there fighting for factory worker rights in developing and third world countries if fighting for the Right to Life is what God has ordained you to do? You can't have it both ways.

To belittle the effects of pollution on the already living human population, to make some cheap point about abortion somehow being worse may not be wrong, but it makes you look like a complete hypocrite.



Well, I disagree on the first part. But I would agree in many instances on the second part.



You don't think God could be weeping over pollution and global warming as well?



That's despicable. As it goes against a woman's right to control her body. Whether she goes the abortion route of giving birth route.



Yes. There's been an example of a woman in China posted in this very section, and if I remember correctly, most pro-choicers felt it to be a crime.

If you're going to a lobby a cheap insult, at least make sure the insinuation that we're heartless and cold witches who want the government to abort women's fetus' without consent, at least make sure its plausible. Because comments in said thread would prove you wrong.



Why shouldn't she? You haven't given any real reason besides "God or my religion or my belief system says that is wrong."

First of all talking about polution is admirable but off topic.
Please keep your comments on topic about abortion.
God created everything,I take it you are an evolutionist then?
So dont you think that God would weep over His lost children aborted before having a chance of a fulfilling and full life?
Based on your comments it is not just about abortion,it is about woman`s rights.
Well again,that is off topic ,we are talking about abortion,not woman`s rights.
Save that for another forum.
Again,we are talking here about abortion from a Christian perspective and incidentally I do sponser a Child who lives in an African country.
This kind of giving is very rewarding and I would recommend it.

 

[Trashionista]

First of all talking about polution is admirable but off topic.

The why did you bother responding - albeit, weakly - to a comment about CO2 and gas emissions?

Please keep your comments on topic about abortion.

Then I'll ask you to please actually READ my response before you pull a rhetorical question out that has absolutely no connection to my reponse.

God created everything,I take it you are an evolutionist then?

Yes, I believe evolution is plausible.
However, to say God Creates Everything! is a bit extreme. I certainly don't believe God built the pyramids or created the lightbulb. But I don't understand how that says "Evolutionist".
So, again, if you're going to make a point, please make sure the point actually makes sense and is a reasonable inferrence from something I've actually posted.

So dont you think that God would weep over His lost children aborted before having a chance of a fulfilling and full life?

You've made similar points before. But it doesn't mean I can push that belief into the legal system, not does it mean I should be suggesting that viewpoint onto all women's bodies and their decision making process.

Based on your comments it is not just about abortion,it is about woman`s rights.

And you'd be correct.

Well again,that is off topic ,we are talking about abortion,not woman`s rights.

Its a fetus inside a WOMAN. It is all about women's right - and that woman's Right to Choose.

Save that for another forum.

The one point I actually make on topic and yet you criticize.

Again,we are talking here about abortion from a Christian perspective and incidentally I do sponser a Child who lives in an African country.
This kind of giving is very rewarding and I would recommend it.

A) The example I gave was POLLUTION. So while Africa has suffered from polluted water and such, I don't see how your comment is relevant.

B) Abortion is also a legal issue. And as it is humans who commit abortion - of all walks of life - you can't say it inherently always involves a Christian perspective or a Christian God.

 

[lincolngreen50]

The why did you bother responding - albeit, weakly - to a comment about CO2 and gas emissions?



Then I'll ask you to please actually READ my response before you pull a rhetorical question out that has absolutely no connection to my reponse.



Yes, I believe evolution is plausible.
However, to say God Creates Everything! is a bit extreme. I certainly don't believe God built the pyramids or created the lightbulb. But I don't understand how that says "Evolutionist".
So, again, if you're going to make a point, please make sure the point actually makes sense and is a reasonable inferrence from something I've actually posted.



You've made similar points before. But it doesn't mean I can push that belief into the legal system, not does it mean I should be suggesting that viewpoint onto all women's bodies and their decision making process.



And you'd be correct.



Its a fetus inside a WOMAN. It is all about women's right - and that woman's Right to Choose.



The one point I actually make on topic and yet you criticize.



A) The example I gave was POLLUTION. So while Africa has suffered from polluted water and such, I don't see how your comment is relevant.

B) Abortion is also a legal issue. And as it is humans who commit abortion - of all walks of life - you can't say it inherently always involves a Christian perspective or a Christian God.

I gather from your comments that your agenda is womans rights and pro choice rights.
There are much more admirable things regarding those topics that you could be fighting for rather than concentrating on supporting the practise of pulling apart a vunerable baby from the body of the one person that a baby would expect total protection from danger.

 

[Trashionista]

I gather from your comments that your agenda is womans rights and pro choice rights.

I'm not a feminazi who's involved in Women's Lib movement on campus. But if the question is asked of me, I do lean to the pro-choice side.

And again, I think this is another example of you not actually reading what I've posted. I don't know how you can an inferrence that I am constantly in support of female rights when I in fact, have talked mostly in the posts you've quoted about CO2 emissions and the like.

If you had said "Quirk, you're a Gore-worshipping, Green Peace loving, Save the Whales! idiot" I'd understand at least some point you were trying to make. As its a reasonable inferrence. To suggest I'm a feminazi based on my pro-choice views just makes you look uninformed, and makes me doubt whether you have actually read any post I've made that you've decided to quote.

There are much more admirable things regarding those topics that you could be fighting for rather than concentrating on supporting the practise of pulling apart a vunerable baby from the body of the one person that a baby would expect total protection from danger.

There are other things I think are more important, yes. I guess we'll just agree to disagree.

And no-one here supports abortion. The support is in the right to CHOOSE.