Natman
Well-Known Member
- Aug 17, 2004
- 918
- 60
- 71
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
I would tend to agree with you. The problem we have, particularly here in "capitalist" America, is that by doing so ,we set a precident that human life is a cheap commodity and thereby encourage the creation and destruction of even MORE human beings.Milla said:I am anti-abortion. I am also of the belief that life does begin at conception. But there comes a question of where one can do the greater good. An embryo sitting in cold storage at an IVF clinic is not suffering. A child in an orphanage in Siberia or China, a child in foster care, bounced from home to home, a baby born to a mother addicted to drugs, who abandons the child at the hospital, these children are already suffering. They need a home now. If one cares so much for human life, one ought think of them before one thinks of a proto-human yet unaware of its environment. For me, if the choice is between letting a child catch and die of tuberculosis in some third-world orphanage, and letting an embryonic child never see awareness of the world, well, I will choose to help the child who is already sentient and aware.
Until recently, I did not realize that IVF required the fertilization of hundreds of eggs. Now I find it to be almost as bad as abortion.
Son-cerely,
Nate
Upvote
0