If i got somthing that i broke fixed by someone who stole somthing to fix the thing that was broken but i didnt know that they stole to fix my broken thing is it a obligation to not use the thing that was fixed by somthing stolen?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If i got somthing that i broke fixed by someone who stole somthing to fix the thing that was broken but i didnt know that they stole to fix my broken thing is it a obligation to not use the thing that was fixed by somthing stolen?
JoshIcedogs, no, you don't have to stop using it. It was wrong for the other person to steal, but it's not wrong for you to benefit from the theft. However, you have a bunch of affirmative duties, such as disapproving of the theft, reporting it to the authorities, and not taking any action to condone the other person's behavior.
Isn´t the answer supposed to be written on our hearts or something?If i got somthing that i broke fixed by someone who stole somthing to fix the thing that was broken but i didnt know that they stole to fix my broken thing is it a obligation to not use the thing that was fixed by somthing stolen?
If you are questioning the fact of the thing after knowing how the it came to be. You are right to do so. Return the Item and be honest to the owner that the broken item belongs to and as of the stolen it is stolen now return it. It is unacceptable for replacement. In which two wrongs don't make it right.If i got somthing that i broke fixed by someone who stole somthing to fix the thing that was broken but i didnt know that they stole to fix my broken thing is it a obligation to not use the thing that was fixed by somthing stolen?
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." -- Edmund Burke
Better yet, have it the name of a mathematical property by which the particles are described.
I can see it now.
"Does that particle possesses question."
"Therefore, we must question the questionability of questioning questionness as a method of defining if it possesses question."
Headache.
Well it was glue so i dont know hwat i could do there.If you took something to someone for them to fix that thing KNOWING they were going to use something stolen to fix it... then yes, that would be wrong. If they offered to fix it, and you got it back and later found out it was stolen... I don't see a problem there... depending on what was fixed and what was stolen.
Example: You have a broken can-opener. someone fixes it by taking off the blade, cleaning it, and putting it back on. But they used a stolen screw driver.... Don't worry about it at all.
However: You have a car with a bad engine... someone steals an engine and puts it in your car... If there's a way you can give that engine back, you should. Basically, if you COULD give the stolen item back... it would be a good idea to... the more valuable the stolen item, the more likely you should give it back... It's a bit subjective...
If I fix your computer with a new stick of ram I got from an old computer my uncle's not using any more... You shouldn't worry about it. If I fix it with a stick of ram I stole from Office Max... you should probably give it back to office max.
When in doubt, it's good to err on the side of caution... if you can give it back, it'd be nice. But not knowing what was stolen or what was fixed, I can't say that it's positively something wrong.
Certainly just "not using it" doesn't make it right. Either it should be used, or given back. "not using it" helps no one.