Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Star Formation and why evolution is not true
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oliver" data-source="post: 47691960" data-attributes="member: 1906"><p>Why do you associate the Big Bang theory with "atheist cosmologists"? After all, one of the first proponents of this theory was a catholic (Georges Lemaître) who would later be a member of the Pontifical academy of sciences. </p><p></p><p>As a weak atheist, I think that this theory is a good argument in favor of several religious beliefs since it points more or less to a beginning (a least it is one of the few things that led me to seriously consider a lot of philosophical questions). And if I look at the first reaction of the RCC toward this theory, it seems that I'm not the only one: for example, Pope Pius XII mentionned this theory in his "Un'Ora".</p><p></p><p>So I really don't understand this trend among Christian fundamentalists to reject this theory as the fruit of "atheist cosmologists". It really seems like a political move or a basic rejection of the current scientific paradigms more than the results of a careful analysis of the evidence or even a well-thought theological argument.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oliver, post: 47691960, member: 1906"] Why do you associate the Big Bang theory with "atheist cosmologists"? After all, one of the first proponents of this theory was a catholic (Georges Lemaître) who would later be a member of the Pontifical academy of sciences. As a weak atheist, I think that this theory is a good argument in favor of several religious beliefs since it points more or less to a beginning (a least it is one of the few things that led me to seriously consider a lot of philosophical questions). And if I look at the first reaction of the RCC toward this theory, it seems that I'm not the only one: for example, Pope Pius XII mentionned this theory in his "Un'Ora". So I really don't understand this trend among Christian fundamentalists to reject this theory as the fruit of "atheist cosmologists". It really seems like a political move or a basic rejection of the current scientific paradigms more than the results of a careful analysis of the evidence or even a well-thought theological argument. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Star Formation and why evolution is not true
Top
Bottom