Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don't agree with this section. All believers should keep Torah.
Those who don't and who teach others not to follow Torah will be called the
least in heaven if they are saved at all. (Matthew 5:19, John 14:15)
Implying that Christians who do not keep the Torah are not saved is actully a violation of the site flaming rule.
● Stating or implying that another Christian member, or group of members, are not Christian is not allowed.
Not saved means not Christian.
I see a contradiction here;
1This implies NOT ALL Jews and Gentiles are called to keep Torah. A standard MJ belief*.
2This implies that Yeshua has instructed (all) us (Jews and Gentiles) to keep the Torah of Moses. A one law belief.
3This implies that (all) Jews and/or Gentiles have a covenantal responsibility to keep Torah. A one law belief.
I realize your trying to appease both groups here. But you are setting yourself up for division and divisiveness by attempting to squeeze two opposing beliefs within one statement of purpose.
I see this happening. The one law believer teaches that Yeshua kept the Torah of Moses and has instructed 'us' Jews and Gentiles to keep it (follow me). The Messianic Jew replies back that NOT ALL Jews and/or Gentiles are called to this 'irrevocable calling'. The one law believer responds that both Jews and/or Gentiles MUST NOT forsake our covenantal responsibilities within the Torah. The MJ responds that not ALL have this calling.
And we are right back to were we started........ because of these contractions within the SOP.
*What makes this all the more confusing is this implies that 'we believe'... 'not all Jews are called to keep Torah.
You bother to differentiate the ALL in number one, but you do not differentiate any difference within 2 or 3. 2 states Yeshua HAS instructed us (all of us) to keep Torah (follow him). 3. states both Jews and Gentiles have a covenantal responsibility within Torah. Not some, but all. 2 and 3 contradict 1.
I would like to note that the term 'covenantal responsibilities' are taken explicitly and directly from the UMJC definition of Messianic 'Jews'. And it is being applied to 'us' ALL, both Jews and Gentiles. As if the nations of the world had/have a covenantal responsibility commanded with the Torah given to Moses. You have taken what was solely intended to identify Judaism/Jews and have remanded it for your own 'faith'. A reverse replacement theology.
http://www.levhashem.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Defining_Messianic_Judaism.pdf
Do a search within this document and tell me how many times the term 'covenantal responsibility' is stated, and who it was talking about. This term was garnered from when I used the UMJC definitions to help define 'Messianic Judaism'. To commandeer this term to apply to gentiles is not really accurate nor fair.
All believers should keep Torah.
On another note one law theology which generally says if you're not keeping the Law then... Is a bad theology.
This is how you interpret the text. I don't agree with how you understand it. This is a forum for a wider range of opinions than just yours.
According to the 'invited non-messianic Jews' thread yonah is a member here.You are not MJ. You do not have to agree. We are speaking of
MJ standards and rules.
According to the 'invited non-messianic Jews' thread yonah is a member here.
If you want to nominate a (non MJ) Jew for consideration to have member privileges here please PM me as well
Atheists can't vote against MJ beliefs.
Let's keep things civil.
Look...here's my two cents.
c) Serial reporting should be banned. Reports should be limited to one or two per member per three-month period. Members should be encouraged to talk it out.
My understanding is that historically this forum encouraged non-Christian Jews to share in discussions regarding Judaism and Torah practice and many other topics and this was desired. Also that Non-Trinitarian Messianics were allowed. However neither could teach against the SOF of the site or the SOP of this forum, which would include links to sites teaching against these things. The standard for all the congregational forums is that debate against the SOF and the SOP of that congregation is not allowed. In fact, not even a member of that forum can debate against their beliefs. For example, even if a member has a Baptist icon, they cannot promote infant baptism for salvation in the Baptist forum, nor post links to sites that teach that.a) non-Trinitarians lose the right to debate in MJ. They have no commitment to the overall theology of CF and don't have debating rights in any of the other faith group forums. They should take their debates to the proper assigned areas within CF. This helps overall equality for all the denominational and faith group forums and brings MJ into alignment with them.
If links go against the SOF of the site or the SOP of this forum, then it is a violation - however, if it is to a site for Judaism and is sharing something common to the members here, like the meaning of a particular feast day, then we can certainly give leeway there.b) that in the spirit of keeping unity (One New Man) no anti-missionary, anti-Christian, anti-egalitarian (Jew and Gentle as one) links, or links to teachers (eg. Michael Rood) should be allowed. These are inflammatory to the Christians on CF and the Messianics who love them.
It is not my intention to derail the thread, so I will only say this one time and then I will drop it. Replacement Theology is when the Church claims to replace Israel. It is not RT for a Jew to become a Christian--he does not stop being a Jew to do so. I am a Jew who is a Christian, and it is not RT -- I do not teach RT (I find it absolutely deplorable).The argument you put forward is very similar to the exact opposite - that they become Christians, not Jews. THAT is clearly RT.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?