- Mar 23, 2004
- 249,106
- 114,203
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Constitution
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
- Status
- Mar 23, 2004
- 249,106
- 114,203
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Constitution
Upvote
0
tulipbee
Worker of the Hive
I clicked on your link and thinking I replied to my post at http://www.christianforums.com/t7448400/ but I posted here.How so?
Btw, have you or anyone you know ever made it on the FSTDT site?
Upvote
0
This discussion is mute there is no such thing as Planet X or little green men from mars so keep your opinions on this to yourselves please and also Kermit The Frog is indeed the anti Christ search in the deepest darkest dankest cave and you'll find the truth on this.
Forgive me
P.S. The jibberish above was brought to you by the letter S.
Forgive me
P.S. The jibberish above was brought to you by the letter S.
Upvote
0
- Jul 6, 2004
- 25,292
- 2,868
- 61
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
- Mar 23, 2004
- 249,106
- 114,203
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Constitution
Upvote
0
- Mar 23, 2004
- 249,106
- 114,203
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Constitution
Upvote
0
- Mar 23, 2004
- 249,106
- 114,203
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Constitution
Upvote
0
NorrinRadd
Xian, Biblicist, Fideist, Pneumatic, Antinomian
- Sep 2, 2007
- 5,571
- 595
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
No, the discussion is "mute" because these are silent words on a screen and I am not using any sort of text-to-speech device.
It is "moot" for the reasons you cite.
This message brought to you by the Vocabulary Police.
Upvote
0
- May 19, 2015
- 125,550
- 28,531
- 74
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Upvote
0
- May 19, 2015
- 125,550
- 28,531
- 74
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Upvote
0
- Mar 23, 2004
- 249,106
- 114,203
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Constitution
Upvote
0
- May 19, 2015
- 125,550
- 28,531
- 74
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
I recognize this member!
Quote# 73098
[Can we philosophically prove that God must be good?]
The argument I love most against Atheism is this. If Atheism is true, then all Atheists have absolute knowledge and can know everything (we know that this isn't true because of disagreement so this hinders Atheism, but for the sake of argument..).
If Atheists can know everything, then they are just as knowledgeable as what we define to be God. This makes Atheists God. Therefore God is an Atheist. YIKES! shoddy logic.
hamashiachagape, Christian Forums 85 Comments [5/23/2010 6:06:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 90
Quote# 73098
[Can we philosophically prove that God must be good?]
The argument I love most against Atheism is this. If Atheism is true, then all Atheists have absolute knowledge and can know everything (we know that this isn't true because of disagreement so this hinders Atheism, but for the sake of argument..).
If Atheists can know everything, then they are just as knowledgeable as what we define to be God. This makes Atheists God. Therefore God is an Atheist. YIKES! shoddy logic.
hamashiachagape, Christian Forums 85 Comments [5/23/2010 6:06:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 90
Upvote
0
- Status
Similar threads
