Sports Should Unify, Not Divide Us

[Zaha Torte]

I brought up another kind of indoctrination, the point being that the indoctrination of children into society is going to involve many differing aspects and facets, I see counselors who are advocates for children who happen to be LGBTQIA+ and others see “groomers”.

By definition any "educating", "counseling" or even "parenting" would be forms of "indoctrination"?

You realize how pointless you bringing this up was?

What is an "advocate for children"?

Do you believe that teachers and counselors should be discussing their sexuality with children?

Do you believe that teachers and counselors should be discussing the sexuality of children?

Do you believe that teachers and counselors should be discussing their political opinions with children?

Because different (and myriad) indoctrinations take place all of the time in schools, some of it is detrimental, but we will disagree on which is which sometimes.

You don't think we should have clear lines on what subjects should or should not be discussed with children at their schools?

(No, I’m not championing “sexual deviancy”, either. That would likely be a forum no-no, to boot.)

I am glad you are saying that, but your arguments make me doubt - since you are employing an equivalency fallacy.

 

[Astrid]

In a way, they are. The abuse of language is an existential threat.

An apple is an apple no matter what adjective is used. There is only one kind of man, a biological man. There is no need for this adjective except to DESTROY THE CONCEPT of man. Hence, when they say "trans man" but is no kind of man at all but a woman, they are attacking our ability to to think properly, to identify reality properly to use our consciousness properly.

The end game is for us to lose our capacity to differentiate, and ultimately fail to differentiate right from wrong. Such a world will be easy picking for the devil.

So people who recognjze nuances and distinctions
whose very existence you choose to deny are dupes or agents of Satan, out to destroy christianity.

That's quite a claim.

 

[Soldier of Christ1516]

So people who recognjze nuances and distinctions
whose very existence you choose to deny are dupes or agents of Satan, out to destroy christianity.

That's quite a claim.

That’s what you got out of what I wrote? Wrong on each and every point.

 

[Astrid]

That’s what you got out of what I wrote? Wrong on each and every point.

Looks right to me but if not presse exprain.

 

[Soldier of Christ1516]

Looks right to me but if not presse exprain.

Let’s start with the notion of destroying a concept. What part of this fails to register with your internal processing?

 

[Astrid]

Let’s start with the notion of destroying a concept. What part of this fails to register with your internal processing?

Play snark with someone else.

Maybe they won't notice you can't explain yourself.

 

[Soldier of Christ1516]

Play snark with someone else.

Maybe they won't notice you can't explain yourself.

Sweetie. I did explain myself. You just don’t like the explanation. Go play obtuse with someone else.