• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

SpaceX T- One Hour

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
11,387
7,705
25
WI
✟644,798.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
  • Useful
Reactions: Ophiolite
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,717
8,056
.
Visit site
✟1,255,989.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Nice SpaceX Falcon Heavy launch earlier in the day. We have an additional sequence here... BECO - Booster Engine Cut-Off. I am wondering the fate of the Main Engine. Did they recover it?

0:02 Launch
2:00 BECO - Booster Engine Cut-Off
7:00 Side booster return to launch site

 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexB23
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,717
8,056
.
Visit site
✟1,255,989.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
A pair of sonic booms shook Florida’s Space Coast as SpaceX recovered the two side boosters on the three-core Falcon Heavy rocket, tail numbers B1072 and B1086. They touched down at Landing Zone 1 (LZ-1) and Landing Zone 2 (LZ-2) at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station a little more than eight minutes after liftoff. The core booster, B1087, was expended following separation with the rocket’s upper stage. All three of boosters being used on this mission were brand new. - Live coverage: SpaceX launches final NOAA GOES weather satellite on Falcon Heavy rocket – Spaceflight Now

So apparently, the core booster (main engine), B1087, was expended following separation. Meaning, as I am supposed, in the Atlantic Ocean somewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexB23
Upvote 0

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
11,387
7,705
25
WI
✟644,798.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Nice SpaceX Falcon Heavy launch earlier in the day. We have an additional sequence here... BECO - Booster Engine Cut-Off. I am wondering the fate of the Main Engine. Did they recover it?

0:02 Launch
2:00 BECO - Booster Engine Cut-Off
7:00 Side booster return to launch site

Darn, I was at work. :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockytopva
Upvote 0

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
11,387
7,705
25
WI
✟644,798.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Nice SpaceX Falcon Heavy launch earlier in the day. We have an additional sequence here... BECO - Booster Engine Cut-Off. I am wondering the fate of the Main Engine. Did they recover it?

0:02 Launch
2:00 BECO - Booster Engine Cut-Off
7:00 Side booster return to launch site

Imagine the roar of those engines in person. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockytopva
Upvote 0

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
11,387
7,705
25
WI
✟644,798.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
A pair of sonic booms shook Florida’s Space Coast as SpaceX recovered the two side boosters on the three-core Falcon Heavy rocket, tail numbers B1072 and B1086. They touched down at Landing Zone 1 (LZ-1) and Landing Zone 2 (LZ-2) at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station a little more than eight minutes after liftoff. The core booster, B1087, was expended following separation with the rocket’s upper stage. All three of boosters being used on this mission were brand new. - Live coverage: SpaceX launches final NOAA GOES weather satellite on Falcon Heavy rocket – Spaceflight Now

So apparently, the core booster (main engine), B1087, was expended following separation. Meaning, as I am supposed, in the Atlantic Ocean somewhere.
Any updates on where in the Atlantic the core booster crashed?
 
Upvote 0

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
11,387
7,705
25
WI
✟644,798.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
They were quite on that one! I would be interested in finding out. Was it too far downrange?
I am not sure, cos I'm not a rocket scientist. ;) Is the center (main booster) supposed to be reusable just as the left and right boosters, or is it only single-use?


Yes, a pun had to be made.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockytopva
Upvote 0

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
11,387
7,705
25
WI
✟644,798.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
@rockytopva Seems that NASA Spaceflight explained why the booster was expended, as it would not have enough fuel to return back to a droneship. I feel bad when stuff is wasted. But hey, physics has the final say. If the payload was lighter, and the trajectory different, maybe the center booster could have returned back to Earth.

The launch took place on time and with the payload weighing over 5,000 kg, the center core of the Falcon Heavy, B1087, was expended, because as expected, it was unable to preserve enough propellant to land softly on a droneship. The two side boosters, B1072 and B1086, performed a return-to-launch-site landing at Landing Zones 1 and 2, respectively., marking the 249th and 250th consecutive successful landings by Falcon boosters.

Source:
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockytopva
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,717
8,056
.
Visit site
✟1,255,989.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
@rockytopva Seems that NASA Spaceflight explained why the booster was expended, as it would not have enough fuel to return back to a droneship. I feel bad when stuff is wasted. But hey, physics has the final say. If the payload was lighter, and the trajectory different, maybe the center booster could have returned back to Earth.

The launch took place on time and with the payload weighing over 5,000 kg, the center core of the Falcon Heavy, B1087, was expended, because as expected, it was unable to preserve enough propellant to land softly on a droneship. The two side boosters, B1072 and B1086, performed a return-to-launch-site landing at Landing Zones 1 and 2, respectively., marking the 249th and 250th consecutive successful landings by Falcon boosters.

Source:
That... Then... Must have been a heavy lift! The math, science, and computer programming for all of that to happen must be astonishing!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AlexB23
Upvote 0

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
11,387
7,705
25
WI
✟644,798.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
That... Then... Must have been a heavy lift! The math, science, and computer programming for all of that to happen must be astonishing!
Agreed. Advanced calculus probably had to be used, along with physics and computer simulations. :) It is too late for me to think about calculus. Had bad experience in a calc class, a bad professor who did not explain the math in a good way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockytopva
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
9,798
2,489
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟199,168.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
A pair of sonic booms shook Florida’s Space Coast as SpaceX recovered the two side boosters on the three-core Falcon Heavy rocket, tail numbers B1072 and B1086. They touched down at Landing Zone 1 (LZ-1) and Landing Zone 2 (LZ-2) at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station a little more than eight minutes after liftoff. The core booster, B1087, was expended following separation with the rocket’s upper stage. All three of boosters being used on this mission were brand new. - Live coverage: SpaceX launches final NOAA GOES weather satellite on Falcon Heavy rocket – Spaceflight Now

So apparently, the core booster (main engine), B1087, was expended following separation. Meaning, as I am supposed, in the Atlantic Ocean somewhere.
Anyone remember the camera crew on the Space X roof going NUTS after the Falcon Heavy boosters landed? There were 3 booms per rocket, so they had just filmed them land but the speed of sound was so slow it took a moment to catch up to the rockets. Then "Boom boom boom - boom boom boom" and the camera crew started dancing about and we mysteriously lost footage! :oldthumbsup: (The rockets HAD landed - but it was funny.)
 
Upvote 0

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
11,387
7,705
25
WI
✟644,798.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Anyone remember the camera crew on the Space X roof going NUTS after the Falcon Heavy boosters landed? There were 3 booms per rocket, so they had just filmed them land but the speed of sound was so slow it took a moment to catch up to the rockets. Then "Boom boom boom - boom boom boom" and the camera crew started dancing about and we mysteriously lost footage! :oldthumbsup: (The rockets HAD landed - but it was funny.)
Ooh, I did not see that footage of the SpaceX crew going nuts, but that sounds funny. :)
 
Upvote 0