- Aug 3, 2004
- 14,082
- 1,003
- 84
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Widowed
I have just finished reading Brian McLaren's book "A Generous Orthodoxy." The book registered with me in many areas and as I have ended up being part of a house church, although that is not the topic of his book.
I was able to identify with this statement
You may already be a Christian, struggling, questioning, and looking for reasons to stay in. Or you may have officially left the Christian community, but part of your heart is still there, and you wonder if you might someday return. So many of us have come close to withdrawing from the Christian community. It's not because of Jesus or his good news, but because of frustrations with religious politics, dubious theological propositions, difficulties in interpreting passages of the Bible that feel barbaric (especially to people sensitized by Jesus to the importance of compassion), and/or embarrassments from recent and not-so-recent church history." Or perhaps it's simply boredom-dreary music, blase sermons, sappy answers to tough questions, and other adventures in missing the point. Or perhaps it's fatigue-a treadmill of meetings and books and programs and squabbles that yield more duties, obligations, guilt trips, and stress.
Question: Why have we stayed in? Answer: Where else would we go? Would divesting ourselves of our faith in Jesus be an improvement? Would becoming just another uncommitted, secular American (or any nationality) consumer, dreaming of a bigger car or mortgage or savings account, be a step in the right direction? And if we decided to disassociate from the chequered career of the Christian community, are we so arrogant or naive as to think we and our descendants would do better? Wouldn't the very act of disassociation itself be a kind of arrogant and elitist move, and therefore spiritually dangerous? Doesn't the chequered career, once fully acknowledged, help to make recurrences less likely, by humbling us, sensitizing us to the abuses of religion? See Chapter 19.
John
NZ
I was able to identify with this statement
You may already be a Christian, struggling, questioning, and looking for reasons to stay in. Or you may have officially left the Christian community, but part of your heart is still there, and you wonder if you might someday return. So many of us have come close to withdrawing from the Christian community. It's not because of Jesus or his good news, but because of frustrations with religious politics, dubious theological propositions, difficulties in interpreting passages of the Bible that feel barbaric (especially to people sensitized by Jesus to the importance of compassion), and/or embarrassments from recent and not-so-recent church history." Or perhaps it's simply boredom-dreary music, blase sermons, sappy answers to tough questions, and other adventures in missing the point. Or perhaps it's fatigue-a treadmill of meetings and books and programs and squabbles that yield more duties, obligations, guilt trips, and stress.
Question: Why have we stayed in? Answer: Where else would we go? Would divesting ourselves of our faith in Jesus be an improvement? Would becoming just another uncommitted, secular American (or any nationality) consumer, dreaming of a bigger car or mortgage or savings account, be a step in the right direction? And if we decided to disassociate from the chequered career of the Christian community, are we so arrogant or naive as to think we and our descendants would do better? Wouldn't the very act of disassociation itself be a kind of arrogant and elitist move, and therefore spiritually dangerous? Doesn't the chequered career, once fully acknowledged, help to make recurrences less likely, by humbling us, sensitizing us to the abuses of religion? See Chapter 19.
John
NZ