Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I would add that FTX was basically set up as a scheme.
The way it was self dealing was meant to make it's coin inflate in value by trading it back and forth between FTX and the hedge fund to whatever value they wanted it to be at.
Fried spoke at length and with great eloquence to congress about the ills of the financial crisis, but now it sounds like he was someone who felt like they could have set up a much bigger sham.
That this wasn't set up entirely on purpose is hard to believe. I think they just didn't think they would get caught.
Supposedly the original idea was anomyty in transactions. Supposedly. Which I haven't figured out, either, because it would seem that all someone who wanted to monitor crypocurrency would have to do is to join the blockchain. But it was self-minted fiat currency from the start.What they wanted was an unregulated banking system, and that is why you might want one.
But then, for some reason, they filed for bankruptcy in the US, which gives the US courts jurisdiction that they might not have had otherwise.They also didn't just incorporate in The Bahamas for some legal/tax advantage, but actually ran their company from the islands. Sounds legit.
But then, for some reason, they filed for bankruptcy in the US, which gives the US courts jurisdiction that they might not have had otherwise.
Monitoring the blockchain wouldn't tell you which wallet (crypto-account) belongs to whom. The wallets don't have names associated with them, only numbers. Sometimes it can be deduced that a particular person owns a particular wallet by trades and volumes and sometimes it gets out that a particular person owns a wallet (from trading partners or some such), but overall, it is secret. Which is a double-edged sword, if an account key gets stolen or the accounts get hacked.Supposedly the original idea was anomyty in transactions. Supposedly. Which I haven't figured out, either, because it would seem that all someone who wanted to monitor crypocurrency would have to do is to join the blockchain.
Worse than penny stocks - pump 'em and dump 'em.But it was self-minted fiat currency from the start.
Crypto in general is largely just a scam. The reason fiat currencies have value is they are traded for labor, services, and products.Seriously. I've tried to follow the rise and fall of FTX, and I don't understand it. I know cryptocurrency are all or mostly private fiat issuings and are driven by speculation, and growing up was fascinated by the Tulip Bubble, but I don't understand how FTX found that much in investments for what isn't even printed paper, or how the discovery that an associate company holding billions of their cryptocurrency would trigger the collapse.
Please, no conspiracy theories. This is just trying to understand what went on.
I don't know what the clawback angle is/means?
ETA: Do you mean the lawsuits against the people who shilled for FTX, such as Tom Brady and Larry David? Or the youtube finance gurus who didn't disclose that they were being paid to tout the exchange? The athletes may have an out in that as sports stars, why would they be expected to be giving sound financial advise, but on the other hand, they got paid a ton of money for their endorsements.
Sorry I missed this earlier. Clawback is where those paid or received funds are forced to return it. An example was an employee for a company who pulled down I think six digits worth of pay for fraudulent behavior and was forced to return it. It has also happened to other companies and individuals, the argument being along similar lines. Clawback is different from suing for damages, for in the latter you have to show that damages took place.I don't know what the clawback angle is/means?
ETA: Do you mean the lawsuits against the people who shilled for FTX, such as Tom Brady and Larry David? Or the youtube finance gurus who didn't disclose that they were being paid to tout the exchange? The athletes may have an out in that as sports stars, why would they be expected to be giving sound financial advise, but on the other hand, they got paid a ton of money for their endorsements.
FTX is the catalyst for CNBCs. The fallout allows regulators to denounce independence and reinforce the necessity of oversight through CNBC coins backed by The Federal Reserve. We’re moving from fiat to digital currency which provides a window into our purchases they can’t obtain through cash. It increases their control and ability to silence dissenters. Social credit will follow. China is the example.
The Cryptoteacher covers it well. Reference his videos.
~bella
1. It's "CBDC" (Central bank digital coin) not "CNBC" (a financial cable TV network)
2. The Federal Reserve has not even issued a CBDC yet. (It is apparently being considered, but I frankly don't see the purpose of it.)
3. Your YT link was to a channel not any specific video we might gain insight from. The list of videos are clearly filled with conspiracy theory and financial paranoia.
Correction noted.I’ve corrected the typo and provided a reputable source for insight.
The topics are clearly noted and its a good source to see the connection with WEF and global activities.
Crypto is at best speculation, but most likely the only "investment" one can make is to hype it until some bigger sucker buys your portion. If you want to recover your money, get out, preferably now.I wouldn’t provide something harmful for the OP. I’m an investor and that’s one of my resources.
Aka, new suckers.The explanations are beneficial for novices.
[guy_with_string_map.gif]He connects the dots in a manner that’s understandable.
~bella
Coffeezilla is a little shticky, but he's not a scammer. He explains in a way that is easy to follow.
In this video, Coffeezilla gets SBF to admit that FTX customer funds were co-mingled with Alameda Research's trading/gambling money despite that being against terms of service and illegal.
Looks like you might get your chance to see that.SBF doesn't seem particularly clever, or rather he thinks he's a lot more clever than he is. I'd like to see him take the stand in his own defense...
He is used to being the smartest boy in the room, but now he is trying for the aw shucks, I had no idea defense, I’m just so dumb.SBF doesn't seem particularly clever, or rather he thinks he's a lot more clever than he is. I'd like to see him take the stand in his own defense...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?