Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Some Thoughts On McConnell
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Halbhh" data-source="post: 75674300" data-attributes="member: 375234"><p>About this one important aspect you raised, I think it's more of an open question: I know this idea it's some profound change is the common thought many say. But... someone like Kavanaugh or Gorsuch, or Bennett -- they are as likely as not, more likely than not really, to have integrity generally (most or even almost always I'd expect) and would be reasonably expected to consistently rule according to the Constitution in a mostly reasonable way. At least, <em>not </em>a partisan way. (this is the reasonable expectation ahead of time, and so far I've not seen something yet to make me think otherwise, though I didn't examine a lot, but just a dozen or so things in the news)</p><p></p><p>Consider: on this election they certainly seemed fair/correct, we would agree? They haven't tried to usurp the election nor given that any cover or partial justification to those efforts, but have instead upheld the Constitutional process even just by not speaking otherwise.</p><p></p><p>But I think there is more than this one good we can expect from them. Remember, chief justice Roberts was nominated by Bush. </p><p></p><p>Don't you agree that Roberts is showing an even handed fairness, mostly? I'd not guess too much ahead of time about how these 3 new members will rule(!)....</p><p></p><p>Just my 2 cents. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Halbhh, post: 75674300, member: 375234"] About this one important aspect you raised, I think it's more of an open question: I know this idea it's some profound change is the common thought many say. But... someone like Kavanaugh or Gorsuch, or Bennett -- they are as likely as not, more likely than not really, to have integrity generally (most or even almost always I'd expect) and would be reasonably expected to consistently rule according to the Constitution in a mostly reasonable way. At least, [I]not [/I]a partisan way. (this is the reasonable expectation ahead of time, and so far I've not seen something yet to make me think otherwise, though I didn't examine a lot, but just a dozen or so things in the news) Consider: on this election they certainly seemed fair/correct, we would agree? They haven't tried to usurp the election nor given that any cover or partial justification to those efforts, but have instead upheld the Constitutional process even just by not speaking otherwise. But I think there is more than this one good we can expect from them. Remember, chief justice Roberts was nominated by Bush. Don't you agree that Roberts is showing an even handed fairness, mostly? I'd not guess too much ahead of time about how these 3 new members will rule(!).... Just my 2 cents. :-) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Some Thoughts On McConnell
Top
Bottom