Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Newton was not a scientist.
So intelligent beings who act can design dogs. Therefore, all life as we know it came about through natural selection without any intelligent design.
It's just not relevant.
The person in question said that science does not believe in INVISIBLE things.
Yes, gravity is just an invention. It is an illusion created by curved space.
Yes, I'm aware that this is your theory. What's your point?
Are you surprised that I know your latest theories?You mean the curved space as defined by the SCIENTIFIC THEORY OF RELATIVITY?
Irrelevant.The point that I already made and you are avoiding.
This is a common misconception. Atheists throw it around as though it were true. Why should I believe such a thing?"No need to invoke intelligent agents where none are needed. Or do you think each raindrop is guided by an intelligent being?"
Are you surprised that I know your latest theories?
Irrelevant.
This is a common misconception. Atheists throw it around as though it were true. Why should I believe such a thing?
If someone were accused of killing his wife, would you accept the argument that it is inappropriate to presuppose intelligent agents where none are needed? After all, the entire death of his wife can be explained by natural processes such as blood loss and organ failure.
Newton was not a scientist.
All of creation is evidence. All the evidence for evolution is evidence for creationism. I can not give you any more then what you already have.If it is so simple, maybe you can help us understand, with some evidence?
No, I do not believe that every raindrop (it's all one word, btw) is guided by an intelligent being.Answer the question. Do you think that every rain drop is being guided by an intelligent being simply because a human can make a drop of water fall to the ground?
No doubt evolutionists make it very easy for creationists.Just like hitting the easy button.
Relevance? None.
All of creation is evidence. All the evidence for evolution is evidence for creationism. I can not give you any more then what you already have.
Yet it cannot detect spirits, or dark stuff, of which they claim most of the universe is made of! They can't detect their way out of a paper bag.You are still in denial.
And it doesn't. Science accepts the fact that things are detectable.
Which still can not hope to explain how a mutation in an individual would ever become fixed in the population - unless that individuals descendants are the entire population? So a mutation that occurred today in say, Bob - will never affect anyone except his descendants, which will never be the population, but only a fraction thereof. Unless you are going to kill off everyone else to ensure this happens?
I came to this forum with one question and as yet no one has even attempted to answer that question. Just how does food evolve to become more nutritious? Science is talking about how important it is to eat nutritious food. So how can we apply evolutionary theory in a way that can help us to determine what diet is the best and most nutritious for us. Yet evolutionists do not seem to have anything to contribute when it come to practical application of their theory. When the rubber meets the road evolutionary theory ends up with a flat tire.Really? So a mutation that allows one animal to feed more efficiently then others of it's species, he's more likly to be healthy, more likly to be fit for a mate, more likly to avoid predators, or win fights with others of it's own species so outcompetes, those with the less efficient way to feed. So over time those that are less efficient are the more likly to not make it.
That holds true on the job. We do not have to do the best work around, just better then what everyone else is doing. That usually turns out to be very easy because people seldom give it their best.As the old joke goes, "I don't have to outrun the lion, I just have to outrun you."
I came to this forum with one question and as yet no one has even attempted to answer that question. Just how does food evolve to become more nutritious? Science is talking about how important it is to eat nutritious food. So how can we apply evolutionary theory in a way that can help us to determine what diet is the best and most nutritious for us. Yet evolutionists do not seem to have anything to contribute when it come to practical application of their theory. When the rubber meets the road evolutionary theory ends up with a flat tire.
Plants do not evolve only the animals that eat those plants?*face palms* food doesn't evolve to become more nutritous, we evolve to make adapt to food thats nutritious.
Genesis chaper one says:Do you think that every rain drop is being guided by an intelligent being simply because a human can make a drop of water fall to the ground?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?