Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I think that was me.
What's so funny? ever heard about that lad's 2-piece fish dinner?So, God used a straw broom?
I answered your questions in the other thread. Why you see fit to post them in multiple threads is beyond me.
You know, instead of claiming that whatever you found sould only be explained by a global flood, maybe you could actually back that up with an actual detailed explanation for any of it. Maybe you can explain things a catastrophic flood could not? Like miles of chalk deposits... or deposition of shale, which can only be formed by quiet water?
The first animal fossils, early sponges, appear in the Trezona Formation at Trezona Bore, West Central Flinders, South Australia in 665 mya rock.
The oldest fossil spores reveal evolution of non-vascular plants by the middle to late Ordovician Period 450 mya.
665-450= animal came before plants.
what did they eat? you've had this answered. The first response you ever gave to me was in response to me answering this question elsewhere.
Fungi, bacteria, and each other.
I know, how did they breathe if no plants were there to make oxygen, right?
again, bacteria enriched the early atmosphere with oxygen.
Nice try, though.
First Information is only relevant to an intelligent agent.
I do not know what your string of base pairs does so obviously how can you interpret a change in entropy?
I do sense that you know nothing about information theory so when someone speaks about a loss or gain in entropy you are clueless.
Only in it's entire premise. The weak should die so that the species more fortunate to be able to cope with environmental stresses will survive and prosper.
Dream on evolutionists
Hello, have not been to CF in many months. I was pursuing my recreational hobby during the warm summer months of gold mining.
My hobby has shown me firsthand things that directly contradict the concept of evolution, and also the dating system that is the foundation that the whole house of cards of evolution rests upon.
So what would those things be?
1.) Polystrate Trees
2.) Extremely deep gravel deposits (600 feet deep) buried within Sierra mountain tops.
3.) Reports of bones and fossils in those gravel deposits of species not common to this continent.
4.) Discovery of long extinct species in those same gravel deposits.
5.) Report of Human skull found in same deposits by the most noted geologist of the time.
6.) Probability that these gravel deposits were as a result of a worlwide flood.
7.) Direct evidence found in old mining reports that bolster the worlwide flood theory.
8.) Coarse gold and coincident lode gold veins found within well round placer gravel deposits that can not be explained as being from some massive anceint river, Quite to the contrary, there is no plausible explanation to support any alternative theory other than a rapid chaotic event such as a flood. I have studied old mining reports for decades. The reports of the early miners are well documented and plentiful that contain this information. I have found similar stories even within the geologic community and many that are even contemporary.
So what would I cast into this discussion?
Within a historic mining tunnel of a good friend of is an enigma. His mine starts through solid rock (quartz) for hundreds of feet horizontally. At some poit the nature of the tunnel turns into being a cemented type of rounded gravels that was what the old miners were finding gold mixed within. But at the end of this mine deep inside a mountain (maybe 800 to 1000 feet from the surface).....there are huge rounded river boulders and massive deposits of gravel. Water freely circulates through this placer gold bearing gravel layer. Even within the solid rock portions of the mine water seeps through the cracks and fissures. At the end of the tunnel one sees a 50 foot deep shaft going down that clearly shows the boulders I mentioned. But at the top of the 50 foot deep shaft the enigma I mentioned lies exposed slapping you in the face. There is a portion of the tunnel wall of which appears to be a hard rock deposit of some sort. Look closely and you see angular fragments well mixed throughout this apparent type of hard rock. Within this "rock" are pieces of sinuous or stringy blackened tree bark sticking out in various places. The appearance of the bark is quite obviously redwood, and in remarkably good condition. You can pull this material free and feel the intact fibers in your fingers. This material sits on top of those huge rounded river boulders keep in mind. That hard rock deposit has very distinct sharply angular fragments. Miners noticed and puzzled about these anomolies when they encountered them. I have questioned many miners up in that region and they all have stories to tell like this one, and the sort of odd occurences they saw with their own eyes. Many believe in the flood because of what they have witnessed in their time of mining. This is not somebody sitting around daydreaming about mind fantasies. These guys were within the bowels of the earth witnessing in situ things that test the sensibilty of those that witness them. The old mining reports contain the exact same things I have talked to modern day lifetime miners about. Reality....real people....real things....things that throw serious doubt on evolution and the flawed assumption of time dating that it rests upon.
How can modern geology explain away this anomaly? Those tree bark pieces sticking out of hard rock are billions of years old with water percolating through them?
Come on put on your thinking caps now.
Common sense has to be used for this to be explained away.
Tree bark that is billions of years old? I can't wait to hear this one.........
Angular formed rock on top of huge rounded river boulders buried a 1000 feet inside a Sierra mountain top.....
Come on I want to hear about that ancient river that left 600 deep gravel deposits in its wake....
Come on let's engage some common sense now....
That worldwide flood doesn't seem to be that impossible now eh?
Yes, "bacteria enriched the early atmosphere with oxygen" like the plants do now.
This enrichment took many million of years:
This is exactly what Schneider modeled in his ev computer model, and he observed that random changes filtered through selection produced an increase in information:
Evolution of biological information
So yes, the mechanisms of evolution can increase information.
This is what you would call a horribly flawed conclusion. Correction; a loud and horrible conclusion
This is what you would call a horribly flawed conclusion. Correction; a loud and horrible conclusion
Show us all then how The Flood produced miles of chalk, as we see in England. ....
This is what you would call a horribly flawed conclusion. Correction; a loud and horrible conclusion
Nowhere does the theory of evolution state that the weak SHOULD die. Nowhere. You are confusing an is with an ought.
Isâought problem - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You might as well claim that the theory of gravity states that people ought to fall, therefore we should be pushing people off tall buildings.
OK. Millions MUST DIE so beneficial changes can occur. Is that better? I'm not sure K-8 is ready for these "truths."
Let's cut the chase, shall we? What type of geologic formation, if observed, would falsify a recent global flood? Please be specific.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?