J
Jazer
Guest
This is the same scientific method that proves the Bible is true. So if you really have confidence in the scientific method then you would have confidence in the Bible.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is the same scientific method that proves the Bible is true. So if you really have confidence in the scientific method then you would have confidence in the Bible.How about we ask modern society if they find it reasonable that the scientific method that has allowed our standard of living suddenly stops working when we look at the big bang or evolution?
Nope. It's been shown over and over again how you're wrong. Cherry picking momentary items and showing how their math is correct or something like that doesn't make the Bible scientifically correct.This is the same scientific method that proves the Bible is true. So if you really have confidence in the scientific method then you would have confidence in the Bible.
The scientific method can't show us how we got our moon; but it can produce LSD to make us not care.I have confidence in the scientific method and it shows the Bible is not the work of an omnipotent being.
44:24 Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;
44:25 That frustrateth the tokens of the liars, and maketh diviners mad; that turneth wise men backward, and maketh their knowledge foolish;
44:26 That confirmeth the word of his servant, and performeth the counsel of his messengers; that saith to Jerusalem, Thou shalt be inhabited; and to the cities of Judah, Ye shall be built, and I will raise up the decayed places thereof:
Actually if anything LSD will make you paranoid. I remember when the Harvard Professor was telling young people to "Turn on, tune in, drop out"The scientific method can't show us how we got our moon; but it can produce LSD to make us not care.
This is the same scientific method that proves the Bible is true. So if you really have confidence in the scientific method then you would have confidence in the Bible.
That's sad, isn't it? science can stay one step ahead of the law.Actually if anything LSD will make you paranoid. I remember when the Harvard Professor was telling young people to "Turn on, tune in, drop out"
Drugs are becoming a problem in that they can make a synthetic and it is not in and of itself illegal. A simple law can fix the problem, just make synthetic drugs of a illegal drug illegal. But there is to much money involved to do that. All they have to do is make a slight change and they have a legal drug. The kids can go home and tell their parents that this is legal and it's not illegal. Recently they had a drug that 911 was getting so many calls about that they made it illegal. But it really was causing problems. The devil is out to destroy people. God warns them they have to repent and turn away from their drugs.
But your "family tree" does not exists in nature. It only exists in your imagination based on your fallible interpretation of observations.
No matter how hard I try I just can't figure out how this lady ended up in this tree:
There is a lot to learn in Isaiah. Here we learn that Jerusalem shall be inhabited and we saw that happen after WW2.
But your "family tree" does not exists in nature. It only exists in your imagination based on your fallible interpretation of observations. Stop accusing God of what you did.
No matter how hard I try I just can't figure out how this lady ended up in this tree:
There are no family trees in nature. I dare you to show me one.Its what we find in nature.
Yes, Jesus warns us against that:That's because it's hard to figure anything out with your eyes closed, your fingers in your ears, and your mind shut to reality.
Wikipedia is not nature, just as the Koran is not God. Try again.No, it exists everywhere in nature. The problem is a combination of your lack of understanding and willful blindness.
It's not that difficult really. You just need to learn some science.
She has all the characteristics of hominina which she inhereted by common ancestry.
Hominina - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
She also has all the characteristics of homininae shared with the gorilla which she inhereted by common ancestry.
Homininae - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
She also has all the characteristics of catarrhini shared with the mandrill which she inhereted by common ancestry.
Catarrhini - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Etc. etc.
This really isn't that difficult.
Wikipedia is not nature, just as the Koran is not God. Try again.
...
Yes, Jesus warns us against that:
"YOU WILL KEEP ON HEARING, BUT WILL NOT UNDERSTAND; YOU WILL KEEP ON SEEING, BUT WILL NOT PERCEIVE; FOR THE HEART OF THIS PEOPLE HAS BECOME DULL, WITH THEIR EARS THEY SCARCELY HEAR, AND THEY HAVE CLOSED THEIR EYES, OTHERWISE THEY WOULD SEE WITH THEIR EYES, HEAR WITH THEIR EARS, AND UNDERSTAND WITH THEIR HEART AND RETURN, AND I WOULD HEAL THEM.'" (Matt 13:14-15).
"YOU WILL KEEP ON HEARING, BUT WILL NOT UNDERSTAND; YOU WILL KEEP ON SEEING, BUT WILL NOT PERCEIVE; FOR THE HEART OF THIS PEOPLE HAS BECOME DULL, WITH THEIR EARS THEY SCARCELY HEAR, AND THEY HAVE CLOSED THEIR EYES, OTHERWISE THEY WOULD SEE WITH THEIR EYES, HEAR WITH THEIR EARS, AND UNDERSTAND WITH THEIR HEART AND RETURN, AND I WOULD HEAL THEM.'" (Matt 13:14-15).
There are no family trees in nature. I dare you to show me one.
It shows parts of the bible are about historical events. At least some of those events are not portrayed accurately. It certainly does not show what you insist it does and it does not show the truth of it's claims about a higher being.
Following your logic, the bible is not Jesus. You cannot prove that Jesus said that, and it would matter little if he did. It would only make sense that the authors of the bible would write this.
Fraud has always been frowned upon.
A scientific discovery of an alternative cause would be the falsification test.Cool. Now all you have to do is devise a test with explicit conditions for falsification. Let us know how it turns out. Good luck.
But it is a prediction.It's hardly a prediction at all though.
The belief is in the expansion. Big Bang theory is the scientific explanation of that expansion. But even without the theory there is still the expansion.For one thing, it could mean almost anything, especially if you consider that maybe God could understand the people He was talking to, who would certainly not believe the Big Bang theory.
They sure do. The stars are ordered:Also, what's the "marshaled" about, do the stars need a leader or something?
What?Also, where's the formula? There's not even any numbers, it would be a nearly worthless prediction if it were one.
Also, it's wrong. It's in the past tense. Per the prediction, the universe must have stopped expanding by the time of Isaiah. It hasn't.
If the “figurative speech” is scientifically accurate, then bring on the eggs.All you get by pretending that figurative speech is a scientific prediction is egg on your face.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?