Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You ignoring the rest of my post does not make your ridiculous assertion correct. There is a well documented process and list of ingredients which do not naturally exist in the same place required to make plastic. Please show how that is exactly like a living creature. Failure to do so will demonstrate to everyone that you have nothing.exactly like a living creature.
because we do find such complex system in reality. not a car but something no less complex.
There is a well documented process and list of ingredients which do not naturally exist in the same place required to make plastic. Please show how that is exactly like a living creature. Failure to do so will demonstrate to everyone that you have nothing.
so the claim that spinning motor need design is circular reasoning?
so the claim that spinning motor need design is circular reasoning?
That's not what I asked.there is no natural place on earth that we can see how DNA evolve naturally. and its also true for functional proteins.
It doesn't work with real world examples. All the real world examples were killed off in The Great Robot Penguin revolt of '62. Self-reproducing Automotive Development is all he has left.Then if it makes no difference, why don't you use the real world examples?
so you cant detect design in this image since its circular reasoning?:Yes, along with equivocation and false equivalence fallacy.
You can read all about these fallacies on Wikipedia. I recommend studying them and then learning how to construct an argument that isn't based on these fallacies. Then you'll be able to come up with better arguments.
Circular reasoning - Wikipedia
Equivocation - Wikipedia
False equivalence - Wikipedia
Can't be sure without actually examining the object, but it looks like a manufacturedso you cant detect design in this image since its circular reasoning?:
(image from amazon)
so you cant detect design in this image since its circular reasoning?:
so you cant detect design in this image since its circular reasoning?:
(image from amazon)
Design is suggested by the great symmetry of the object, the perfect circle, the fact that parts have been inscribed with the names of companies that exist separately to this object, and the fact that the object contains no parts which are capable of reproduction, hence no way for it to have been made except by some external means (unlike life forms, which are capable of reproducing themselves).
One of these waterfalls is natural, the other is man made. Please tell us which is which and how you came to that conclusion.so you cant detect design in this image since its circular reasoning?:
(image from amazon)
Or the simple fact we know it's a computer fan and based on preexisting knowledge of human manufacture of such objects, we can conclude it is a designed object.
Because let's face it, that's what we are really doing here: pattern recognition of an object of known origin. That's how we detect design in almost all cases.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?