Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
When you say that X is what your personal experience has been, or that in your region it seems to be X...Perhaps our experience in our regions is different. My experience of the Protestant Church population matches this pretty closely, though the amount of Protestants is a significantly high amount among Christians in my area.
Agreed. Considering I came from a Pentecostal background - and considered myself to be Protestant, my view includes Evangelicals, Pentecostals, Anabaptists, Baptists, Presbyterians and moreIf you use the more limited definition of Protestant, i.e. the mainline Protestant churches you are right. But if you use the broader term then that isn't true.
If we talk about Protestants--just that...Protestants. If we talk about Protestants, or the Protestant Church [sic], or Protestantism, we are generalizing. BUT if so, you CANNOT take some minority opinion or organization or even stray individuals--as is often done on these forums--and make them seem to be typical of Protestantism.If you use the more limited definition of Protestant, i.e. the mainline Protestant churches you are right. But if you use the broader term then that isn't true.
So main-line Protestants. Fair enough. Because when you start adding the Baptists, and all the evangelical churches, then your position would start to become very doubtful.If we talk about Protestants--just that...Protestants. If we talk about Protestants, or the Protestant Church [sic], or Protestantism, we are generalizing. BUT if so, you CANNOT take some minority opinion or organization or even stray individuals--as is often done on these forums--and make them seem to be typical of Protestantism.
I hope that's clear enough.
I'm in agreement with Albion, that just blanketing all non-Catholic/Orthodox churches as Protestant, without either a prefix or suffix, really doesn't help the situation in the discussing this matter. IMO there are more significant differences between the main-line Protestant churches and Evangelical Churches than there are between main-line and Catholic/Orthodox, even though they use much of the same language and adhere to the five Solas. An Evangelical understanding of the five Solas is significantly different IMO than how a Lutheran understands them, for example.Perhaps it would help understand others' viewpoints when considering how many of us used to be non-mainline Protestants an / or Evangelicals who considered that to be a Protestant Church. Many of us used the broader definition for most of our lives.
Yet you have no problem with frequently telling us all what the Catholic Church teaches, and refusing to provide any official sources to back your assertions when your errors are identified. I guess it is fine when you do it, but not so cool when others do.If we talk about Protestants--just that...Protestants. If we talk about Protestants, or the Protestant Church [sic], or Protestantism, we are generalizing. BUT if so, you CANNOT take some minority opinion or organization or even stray individuals--as is often done on these forums--and make them seem to be typical of Protestantism.
I hope that's clear enough.
Certain people are limiting this conversation to mainline Protestants. The thread OP did not reference just mainline Protestants.I'm in agreement with Albion, that just blanketing all non-Catholic/Orthodox churches as Protestant, without either a prefix or suffix, really doesn't help the situation in the discussing this matter. IMO there are more significant differences between the main-line Protestant churches and Evangelical Churches than there are between main-line and Catholic/Orthodox, even though they use much of the same language and adhere to the five Solas. An Evangelical understanding of the five Solas is significantly different IMO than how a Lutheran understands them, for example.
Again, no matter the statostics of Sola vs solo, evangelical Protestants are not the minority. I don't have the time right now to pull up statistics, and that is not my point. It is however significantly wrong to say that mainline Protestants are the majority of Protestants in the common definition today.Not having any statistics to back me up, from my experience true Sola Scriptura Christians are a minority in non-mainline Protestant churches. Most (if not all) Evangelical Protestants IMO are Solo Scripturist.
We will have to disagree on this matter. I get that in most categories that all main-line, evangelical, pentecostal Christians are thrown under the main category of Protestant, IMO this delude the word. The "Protestant" title has become like other common words (such as liberal and conservative) that for all intent and purposes have lost their original meaning, and have become more of a slur word than anything with meaning.Mainline Protestants are now a minority among Protestants in America (where I, and I'm assuming many of you, live), and have been for about twenty years now. As of 1998, they were a minority of the total American Protestant population, at 48% (down from 55% in 1973). Things have not gotten better since then.
Given this, I honestly think the protestation (heh) that you can't take "splinter" groups as representative of Protestantism is not necessarily valid. Sure, if you are talking about taking individual independent churches (e.g., Ted's Church of the Very Bright Lights or something like that) as defining Protestantism, then that makes sense, but if you are looking across all of the bodies that define themselves as part of the Protestant tradition and taking a kind of aggregate approach, then that's totally valid to do, since the non-mainline/'splinter' groups from the clear majority. They may not all fit into the historical category of Protestant, but if they are the majority of Protestants in the place where you live, and have been for decades, then in a real operative sense, they are Protestantism, at least insofar as concerns your country.
Probably moving forward that's going to be even more the case, if current demographic trends hold.
There are two definitions of Protestants:We will have to disagree on this matter. I get that in most categories that all main-line, evangelical, pentecostal Christians are thrown under the main category of Protestant, IMO this delude the word. The "Protestant" title has become like other common words (such as liberal and conservative) that for all intent and purposes have lost their original meaning, and have become more of a slur word than anything with meaning.
Protestants were called Protestant because of it evolved out of a movement to "protest" the Catholic Church. The far majority of those denominations labeled "Protestant" doesn't have that history. Perhaps they should be referred to as Protestant-Protestants?
No body said they were the minority. Albion in my discussion pointed out that he has a very limited definition of what Protestant is. By his definition, which is the only true Protestant churches are what we call main-line Protestant churches, then those Christians in that group that do not believe in the Real Presence IS the minority.Again, no matter the statostics of Sola vs solo, evangelical Protestants are not the minority. I don't have the time right now to pull up statistics, and that is not my point. It is however significantly wrong to say that mainline Protestants are the majority of Protestants.
Also, how much experience have you had in non-mainline Protestant churches?
Albion said they were the minority. I pointed out that most here do not hold that same definition of Protestant that he holds, so for many of us, those who hold to the real presence are the minority.No body said they were the minority. Albion in my discussion pointed out that he has a very limited definition of what Protestant is. By his definition, which is the only true Protestant churches are what we call main-line Protestant churches, then those Christians in that group that do not believe in the Real Presence IS the minority.
I get that, the question I raised is does and should those definitions continue to apply, and make sense. I say they do not. The fallacy we make as Catholics and Orthodox is that we try to throw all the non-Catholic/Orthodox churches into the same pot and call them the same. It just doesn't work. There are just too many differences for that to be helpful.There are two definitions of Protestants:
Protestant
[prot-uh-stuh nt or for 4, 6, pruh-tes-tuh nt]
noun
Both include many evangelical churches. For example, Pentecosts come from the Wesleyan movement which came from he original Protestants.
- any Western Christian who is not an adherent of a Catholic, Anglican, or Eastern Church.
- an adherent of any of those Christian bodies that separated from the Church of Rome during the Reformation, or of any group descended from them.
I get that, and I understand where you are coming from. I'm just saying that we non-Protestant (if you will) Christians change our mentality on this matter. Albion is a member of an Anglican denomination. In all reality he has more in common with our beliefs than lets say someone from a Baptist church. I think that should be respected and understood.Albion said they were the minority. I pointed out that most here do not hold that same definition of Protestant that he holds, so for many of us, those who hold to the real presence are the minority.
It is relevant as the OP did not specify mainline.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?