• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Sola Scriptura

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,477
3,736
Canada
✟879,220.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
I have thank you. A few years ago I had to write a paper for seminary on the Statement interacting with the ideas expressed by its authors....who really ended up being RC Sproul with revisions by the signatories. Sproul wrote it in one night! I wish I had an ounce of Dr. Sproul's ability. That said I disagree with the idea that only in the original inspired documents the Bible is inerrant.

Yours in the Lord,

jm
 
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,477
3,736
Canada
✟879,220.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
AW, is that BB as your avatar?

Is it true BB was the first to disagree with Protestantism and the Reformed Confessions by claiming the Bible is inerrant only in the original inspired documents?
 
Upvote 0
Oct 21, 2003
6,793
3,289
Central Time Zone
✟122,193.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
AW, is that BB as your avatar?

Is it true BB was the first to disagree with Protestantism and the Reformed Confessions by claiming the Bible is inerrant only in the original inspired documents?

Yeah it's ol' Warfield, pointy mustache n' spectacles. Hmm...I dunno, and dunno bout the question, maybe someone like AMR can help. :)
 
Upvote 0

abacabb3

Newbie
Jul 14, 2013
3,217
564
✟91,561.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In my reading of Augustine I found the following devastating blow against the lie that Eastern Orthodox and Catholics teach concerning the supposed equality between Scripture and Tradition, and the necessity of the Church to come with an authoritative interpretation of both. I make comments in between:

In Chapter Three of his second book On Baptism, Against the Donatists:

But who can fail to be aware that the sacred canon of Scripture, both of the Old and New Testament, is confined within its own limits, and that it stands so absolutely in a superior position to all later letters of the bishops, that about it we can hold no manner of doubt or disputation whether what is confessedly contained in it is right and true;

Hmmm, that does not sound like Augustine thought there was an authoritative oral tradition, Magesterium of the Church, or anything else. But, just in case you think we are taking Augustine out of context he continues:

but that all the letters of bishops which have been written, or are being written, since the closing of the canon, are liable to be refuted if there be anything contained in them which strays from the truth

Anything written since the closing of the Canon, according to Augustine, is liable to be refuted. How is this consistent with modern Roman Catholic Dogma that the Ecunemical Councils and the Pope can make statements that, like Scripture, are inerrant? Augustine continues:

either by the discourse of some one who happens to be wiser in the matter than themselves, or by the weightier authority and more learned experience of other bishops, by the authority of Councils; and further, that the Councils themselves, which are held in the several districts and provinces, must yield, beyond all possibility of doubt, to the authority of plenary Councils which are formed for the whole Christian world; and that even of the plenary Councils, the earlier are often corrected by those which follow them...

What?!?! Ecumenical Councils can err and be corrected by ones that follow them?

"Objection," says Mr. Catholic. "He said 'plenary,' not 'ecumenical.'"

According to the Catholic Encyclopedia:

The ecumenical councils or synods of the Universal Church are called plenary council by St. Augustine (C. illa, xi, Dist. 12), as they form a compete representation of the entire Church.

Wow, Augustine must really hold a much higher view of Scripture than do many modern Catholics and Eastern Orthodox, who compare Scripture's authority as equivalent to Councils, Bishops, and Apostolic Tradition reported second hand by them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JM
Upvote 0

AMR

Presbyterian (PCA) - Bona Fide Reformed
Jun 19, 2009
6,717
913
Chandler, Arizona
Visit site
✟219,428.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
AW, is that BB as your avatar?

Is it true BB was the first to disagree with Protestantism and the Reformed Confessions by claiming the Bible is inerrant only in the original inspired documents?
BB Warfield built atop the earlier efforts of AA Hodge here. I think not a few misunderstood both men's argument.

Those who claim an errant text, against the orthodox consensus to the contrary, must prove their case. To claim errors in the scribal copies, the apographa, is hardly a proof: the claim must be proven true of the autographa. The point made by Hodge and Warfield is a logical trap, a rhetorical flourish, a conundrum designed to confound the critics—who can only prove their case for genuine errancy by recourse to a text they do not (and surely cannot) have. See Archibald A. Hodge and Benjamin B. Warfield, Inspiration (1881; repr. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1979), pp. 33–36.

The most thorough treatment of the topic appears in Muller's PRRD, volume 2. Highly recommended.
 
Upvote 0