I noticed throughout Harris' interview with CNN, that she kept looking down; as she was answering the scripted questions; as if she herself was reading a script.
Where do you suppose the teleprompter was hidden from camera view?
lol, you guys do like regurgitating your talking points, don't you?
So why does she seem to have difficulty looking the American people straight in the eye as she tells her story? Drugs?
You know there's no audience there, right? The "American people" in the room are Harris, Walz, Bash, and the production crew. What you perceive to be looking people "straight in the eye" is actually looking into a camera lens.
Amusingly, right in front of the camera lens is where teleprompters are often located in a tv studio. That's how news anchors can read the news while looking straight into the camera. So, you're wondering where the teleprompter is located, while simultaneously complaining about her not looking at the one place it's most likely to be.
No, she's looking around the room, at the table, and she also spends a lot of time looking right at Bash, the "American person" who's actually asking her the questions. In a setup like this that's pre-recorded, I doubt they'd have an indicator as to which camera was active at any given moment, so she couldn't even look people "straight in the eye" if she wanted to.
Before she answered a question, she looked off to one side...as if reading a teleprompter.
Before she answered a question, she looked down...as if reading a script.
Before she answered a question, she paused...as if she was listening to someone giving her the answer.
Before she answered a question, she answered immediately...as if she knew what the question was going to be.
Before she answered a question, she didn't look at the camera...as if she was responding to the person asking the question.
Before she answered a question, she put her hand to her mouth...as if she was slipping in another tablet of some sort.
Before she answered a question, Walz stroked his chin...as if it was a signal to give a particular scripted answer.
Maybe we could take a vote on which is more likely.
She knew all the questions and had time to rehearse.
AFAIK, it's customary to send over at least the subjects that will be addressed. Her answers were certainly canned. They didn't have to be read from a teleprompter.
More broadly, this thread shows how shallow the criticisms from a lot of you guys on the right really are. There's plenty to critique about how her answers were canned and unspecific, but instead, we're talking about where her teleprompter was hidden. It's like you guys have forgotten what it's like to listen to somebody who can speak in complete paragraphs and like you've lost any ability to parse sentences. Her ability to do speak is throwing you off more than the actual content of her words.