Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
So Old Yet So Modern
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Phred" data-source="post: 28209051" data-attributes="member: 10891"><p>The only way "macroevolution" (speciation) cannot be shown is if you define it as a cow giving birth to a dolphin. No one else does.</p><p></p><p>Here you show your ignorance by relying upon these terms... terms which are simply arbitrary and usually used by creationists rather than scientists. But... since you insist upon using them we'd best define them. "Microevolution" is changes that occur within a population yet that population can still interbreed. "Macroevolution" is a change that happens within a population that prevents interbreeding. This is a simple distinction whose importance is very easily explained. Once interbreeding is not possible any changes that happen to one population cannot be spread to the other.</p><p></p><p>Since we've observed and documented both of these sorts of changes micro and macroevolution are fact. </p><p></p><p>My my... what else comes to mind that this statement can be applied to... the Bible? The Constitution? Starting to feel irrelevant yet?</p><p></p><p>Judging from your posts in this thread I don't think you know very much about reality and as such aren't qualified to welcome anyone.</p><p></p><p>You're a great creationist.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: right">.</p> <p style="text-align: right"></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Phred, post: 28209051, member: 10891"] The only way "macroevolution" (speciation) cannot be shown is if you define it as a cow giving birth to a dolphin. No one else does. Here you show your ignorance by relying upon these terms... terms which are simply arbitrary and usually used by creationists rather than scientists. But... since you insist upon using them we'd best define them. "Microevolution" is changes that occur within a population yet that population can still interbreed. "Macroevolution" is a change that happens within a population that prevents interbreeding. This is a simple distinction whose importance is very easily explained. Once interbreeding is not possible any changes that happen to one population cannot be spread to the other. Since we've observed and documented both of these sorts of changes micro and macroevolution are fact. My my... what else comes to mind that this statement can be applied to... the Bible? The Constitution? Starting to feel irrelevant yet? Judging from your posts in this thread I don't think you know very much about reality and as such aren't qualified to welcome anyone. You're a great creationist. [RIGHT]. [/RIGHT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
So Old Yet So Modern
Top
Bottom