Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
So much for natural herd immunity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="com7fy8" data-source="post: 75455671" data-attributes="member: 331347"><p>It seems the researchers measure immunity by the presence and quantity of antibodies. </p><p></p><p>They find that medical workers keep their antibody levels up, while others have had a decrease in antibodies. And ones think the maintained antibody level of workers is because of repeated exposure. </p><p></p><p>So, this for me shows interesting possibilities > </p><p></p><p>May be > once they have first been infected or vaccinated, they can keep their immunity up by exposing themselves to COVID-19 patients, and/or by getting boosters or maybe some sort of over-the-counter spray-mist to inhale before the time of antibody decrease.</p><p></p><p>And if medical workers are getting reinfected at the right timing, maybe this means their antibodies work to keep them from getting sick. So, for all I can see, they need to avoid going too long without a reinfection.</p><p></p><p>So, it could be you need to go hug and kiss whoever gets sick, in time so your antibody production is renewed.</p><p></p><p>It possibly has worked a little like this, with shingles. Two British studies found that seniors had less cases of shingles while more kids had chicken pox. Why, maybe? > the kids infected the adults, stimulating them to renew their chicken pox antibodies, in time to fight off shingles.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="com7fy8, post: 75455671, member: 331347"] It seems the researchers measure immunity by the presence and quantity of antibodies. They find that medical workers keep their antibody levels up, while others have had a decrease in antibodies. And ones think the maintained antibody level of workers is because of repeated exposure. So, this for me shows interesting possibilities > May be > once they have first been infected or vaccinated, they can keep their immunity up by exposing themselves to COVID-19 patients, and/or by getting boosters or maybe some sort of over-the-counter spray-mist to inhale before the time of antibody decrease. And if medical workers are getting reinfected at the right timing, maybe this means their antibodies work to keep them from getting sick. So, for all I can see, they need to avoid going too long without a reinfection. So, it could be you need to go hug and kiss whoever gets sick, in time so your antibody production is renewed. It possibly has worked a little like this, with shingles. Two British studies found that seniors had less cases of shingles while more kids had chicken pox. Why, maybe? > the kids infected the adults, stimulating them to renew their chicken pox antibodies, in time to fight off shingles. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
So much for natural herd immunity
Top
Bottom