Where people say we cannot trust anything we can experience from our senses, it could be totally fake.
This is often defended by saying that our senses are just electric impulses, nerves, etc., and can be simulated. I was thinking about it today(and doi, took me long enough), but would not accepting that this is true be trusting that which we have investigated with our senses? So, using that argument, proving the premise involves violating the premise. And the argument that we could just not exist is best refuted by "I think, therefore I am."
So, any really good, founded arguments for skepticism, sensory or just overall?
This is often defended by saying that our senses are just electric impulses, nerves, etc., and can be simulated. I was thinking about it today(and doi, took me long enough), but would not accepting that this is true be trusting that which we have investigated with our senses? So, using that argument, proving the premise involves violating the premise. And the argument that we could just not exist is best refuted by "I think, therefore I am."
So, any really good, founded arguments for skepticism, sensory or just overall?