Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Thanks TOL for your point. I believe that the Bible says that it is written as a parable, according to those rules of interpretation, as can be found in Mark 4. The law of God, the Bible, is called a parable in Psalm 78: "Give ear, O my people, to my law: incline your ears to the words of my mouth. I will open my mouth in a parable". Again, the Bible clues us in to this in Mark 4:34: "But without a parable spake he not unto them: and when they were alone, he expounded all things to his disciples."I'm considering taking the Literary Framework View of Genesis 1. If you're unfamiliar, this is the view that Genesis 1 is a poem or song that is using a six day framework in order to communicate truths about God and Creation, but not to be understood as six historical days. It's an argument from genre.
However before I really made a commitment to this view I wanted to try it on for size and see if it could be adequately defended. How would you challenge this view? I'll try my best in this thread to defend it.
You have so much right but you have this wrong. Complete the quote and you discover that a thousand years is like a day; meaning that God is timeless, not that His days are 1,000 years long. The creation took six solar days as is confirmed in Exodus 20:11.
. . .Utter foolishness.
Those who claim to believe in both the Scriptures and in evolution have a firm understanding of neither. . . . . .
No no no, TRUE science does those things. The science of the last like... 500 years? Not so much, been VERY agenda driven. Started out as a great idea, but them dang Masons man... they get their claws in everything.... But you do not have to believe that, you have not been down my rabbit trails, I have not been down yours.But the problem with saying you can't trust science is actually saying you can't trust God. Because science merely brings out what the stars, the rocks, and the genomes are telling us, and they were made directly by God.
The billions of years for the earth and the universe stand firmly established. Therefore, scripture must be understood in relation to those facts. Let me point to another fact about scripture.
Scripture over and over says the sun rose and set. It is described as moving across the sky. It is described as halting that motion at Joshua's command. This language is not poetic, it is literal.
Science has revealed the sun doesn't really do that, rather, the earth rotates as the cause of day and night. I can't bring myself to deny that science. Therefore, I re-interpret scripture about the sun rising and setting, and instead of clinging to a forced literal understanding, I allow the understanding that the writer was doing the best he knew as he wrote, and I see no problem allowing him to speak of the sun rising and setting.
It is my contention we can do the same with the age of the earth and the fact of evolution. It seems to me to be a better thing to do than to assert the scriptures are in error.
Its no use arguing against the science. The only way to do that is to first not understand it. Creationists demonstrate this over and over when they try to talk about science as they understand it.
When Jesus referred to the beginning and Adam, you think He was reciting Poetry?I'm considering taking the Literary Framework View of Genesis 1. If you're unfamiliar, this is the view that Genesis 1 is a poem or song that is using a six day framework in order to communicate truths about God and Creation, but not to be understood as six historical days.
Really? So did God create man or did man evolve without divine help?Unless, of course, they actually do.
But the problem with saying you can't trust science is actually saying you can't trust God. Because science merely brings out what the stars, the rocks, and the genomes are telling us, and they were made directly by God.
The billions of years for the earth and the universe stand firmly established. Therefore, scripture must be understood in relation to those facts. Let me point to another fact about scripture.
Scripture over and over says the sun rose and set. It is described as moving across the sky. It is described as halting that motion at Joshua's command. This language is not poetic, it is literal.
Science has revealed the sun doesn't really do that, rather, the earth rotates as the cause of day and night. I can't bring myself to deny that science. Therefore, I re-interpret scripture about the sun rising and setting, and instead of clinging to a forced literal understanding, I allow the understanding that the writer was doing the best he knew as he wrote, and I see no problem allowing him to speak of the sun rising and setting.
It is my contention we can do the same with the age of the earth and the fact of evolution. It seems to me to be a better thing to do than to assert the scriptures are in error.
Its no use arguing against the science. The only way to do that is to first not understand it. Creationists demonstrate this over and over when they try to talk about science as they understand it.
Obviously taking the 7 day creation to be literal 24 hour periods has its problems. For example no creation took place on the first day. Heaven and Earth being created on the 2nd day on. Scripture says that the moon and stars are given for times and seasons.
So linear time didn't begin until the second day, and cyclical time didn't begin till the fourth day.
When Jesus referred to the beginning and Adam, you think He was reciting Poetry?
But the problem with saying you can't trust science is actually saying you can't trust God. Because science merely brings out what the stars, the rocks, and the genomes are telling us, and they were made directly by God.
Before the creation of time itself.
How do you figure?In the "Beginning" God created Heaven and Earth. 'The beginning' didn't start till the second day.
If the scriptures are so deceptive as to present things as they do when something completely different is really the case - we have no logical basis for believing what they say concerning salvation.
We are living in the beginning of the first century of the seventh and LAST millennium, the Millennium of Christ, and the Millennium of Truth, and the Millennium of Judgment, and the Millennium of Vengeance, the seventh and LAST millennium or the seventh and LAST Day of the week of God, so everything that is of the Devil which he offered to JESUS (Mat.4:8to112), yea, all things of the world of Devil will be destroyed and will fall as in an implosion. All structures of the satanic's kingdoms of the world like political, religious, economic, military, social, cultural, will be annhilated. The peoples were warned: when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, … and they will not escape. Will be this powerful world of Devil run more ten years with all its powerful structures? Much much probably not, this is the reason I am emphasizing with another colour this phrase. Are the mankind ready? I see they are not. I repeat, We are living in the first century of the seventh and last millennium, or seventh and LAST Day of the week of God, in the time of Apocalypse, the four riders showed in Revelation 6 are being released and they are moving themselves in the earth, One is of the Lord and three are of the Devil. The most important thing now is to identify who they are, the four horsemen of Apocalypse. I must say peremptorily that One of them is from the Lord, the rider of the white horse (Rev.19:11to21 and 16:13to21) and three are agents of the Devil, a satanic trinity. (Rev.16:13-14)
The Bible says: Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever. (1John2:15-17)
Be ready, be prepared. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?