Just one small point. Be careful in the demand for data where questions of rightness and faith are involved. It might not be inappropriate here, but matters of faith can and do defy empirical data gathering. After all, it has to do with what really is rather than what humans observe.
-Bedwyr
I'm not demanding data - simply stating that I know of none that exists to effectively take a focused stand one way or the other.
And you cannot argue faith. "Faith is the evidence of things not seen" you cant quantify it. I am simply using my knowledge of group dynamics and human behavior to make plausible inferences about Christians because they are human. You can argue that your faith dictates that you will sucessfully invest in a stock that has repaetedly and predicatably shown low performance. If your metaphysical mandates employ you to do so then they cannot be agrued as they are immaterial. But statistical evidence supports that you are probably making a poor investment. For my money I'll go with the numbers. And demand for data supporting the existence of God is infantile and futile as this arguement rests in the realm of philosophy, not empirical speculation.
Your faith is your faith and there is no more arguement. But when what you believe about something is overwhelmingly refuted by empirical evidence then you need to reevaluate the way you think. The existence of God is not at issue here as I've already covered that. A classic example would be Sir Isaac Newton finally confronting the Monastic gestapo of his day with the irrefuatable evidence contradicting their belief that the earth was the center of the universe. Science is not the answer to everything but over the years I've observed that the only times the church has made any real progress is when they have accepted and employed empirical wisdom that is applicable to issues concerning them. For example many people are now diagnosed and succesfully treated for depression and scizophrenia when not too long ago we had massive deliverance conventions to "cast out their demons". My point if statistical data were generated that suggest, and it appears that independent sources suggest so, that in the right situations married people are more happier, healthier, and emotionally stable than singles, are we going to change our way of thinking, or will we continue to wander around in the dark an take our chances? In any case it could be promising, but more research must be done.
-Bedwyr
I'm not demanding data - simply stating that I know of none that exists to effectively take a focused stand one way or the other.
And you cannot argue faith. "Faith is the evidence of things not seen" you cant quantify it. I am simply using my knowledge of group dynamics and human behavior to make plausible inferences about Christians because they are human. You can argue that your faith dictates that you will sucessfully invest in a stock that has repaetedly and predicatably shown low performance. If your metaphysical mandates employ you to do so then they cannot be agrued as they are immaterial. But statistical evidence supports that you are probably making a poor investment. For my money I'll go with the numbers. And demand for data supporting the existence of God is infantile and futile as this arguement rests in the realm of philosophy, not empirical speculation.
Your faith is your faith and there is no more arguement. But when what you believe about something is overwhelmingly refuted by empirical evidence then you need to reevaluate the way you think. The existence of God is not at issue here as I've already covered that. A classic example would be Sir Isaac Newton finally confronting the Monastic gestapo of his day with the irrefuatable evidence contradicting their belief that the earth was the center of the universe. Science is not the answer to everything but over the years I've observed that the only times the church has made any real progress is when they have accepted and employed empirical wisdom that is applicable to issues concerning them. For example many people are now diagnosed and succesfully treated for depression and scizophrenia when not too long ago we had massive deliverance conventions to "cast out their demons". My point if statistical data were generated that suggest, and it appears that independent sources suggest so, that in the right situations married people are more happier, healthier, and emotionally stable than singles, are we going to change our way of thinking, or will we continue to wander around in the dark an take our chances? In any case it could be promising, but more research must be done.
Upvote
0