amariselle
Jesus Never Fails
- Sep 28, 2004
- 6,648
- 4,201
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- CA-Conservatives
For what its worth, while what you said is entirely true, it is not necessarily desirable to have children in your case yet. I know supposedly Freakenomics published that children born when the mother was 25 or older did better than when the mother was younger. And in your case you are just now entering the demographic "sweet spot" to achieve these things (25-35 is considered the perfect time period to have children, earlier or later significantly increases the risk of complete financial calamity...and if that sounds minor, trust someone who's lived through one in that it isn't).
Hmm...perhaps generally speaking those who become parents before the age of 25 struggle more financially, but I think that such a statement can only be applied in a general way. There are some who are younger that have reached a time in life where they can support children, and there are some who are over 35 who may not be able to. So, it all depends on the individual person and their particular circumstances. Also, the financial aspect is very important of course, but so is maturity, and the desire to have a family, and I do not believe that there is any set age that is appropriate for every person, it is a very personal decision, and requires that you really think of where you and your partner are in this regard, and no one else can tell you definitively that you should or should not have children. (Unless of course there are glaring issues). But what I mean is that if you are prepared financially, well then other things are also to be considered, and there is no right or wrong age for it insofar as someone would be able to say that everyone should have children only between the ages of 25 and 35, and that it rarely ever works out at any other time.
Upvote
0