Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Witch is it? are or were?Because you claim there are or were real witches.
Then why are we encouraged to do so, sometimes at the risk of incurring the 'hypocrite' moniker if we choose otherwise?
Interesting that the only ones who think my views are "inconsistent" are non-dispensationalists.No-one actually thinks you SHOULD be - it is a devil's advocate-style argument to lay bare the inconsistency of your views.
I'm sure you're not clueless enough to fail to grasp this point, but I would imagine it reinforces your prejudices to pretend otherwise.
Interesting that the only ones who think my views are "inconsistent" are non-dispensationalists.
Anyone can accuse someone of having a particular view, then refuse to accepts his arguments against that view.
Then accept my challenge: 84.As far as I'm concerned, you haven't sufficiently justified dispensationalism, so you haven't justified your claim that it is wrong to try and execute someone for witchcraft...
Then accept my challenge: 84.
There's nothing to be consistent in; I never practiced that in the first place.Like I said when I addressed this post before - I don't wish for you to be consistent in practice on this one...
There's nothing to be consistent in; I never practiced that in the first place.
I'm addressing those who want us to start that practice back up.
Well, I'm glad you're admitting that anyone who encourages us not to be hypocritical in "that area" are just playing devil's advocate.That would be no-one, then - missing the concept of devil's advocate yet again, I see.
Well, I'm glad you're admitting that anyone who encourages us not to be hypocritical in "that area" are just playing devil's advocate.
It's a figure of speech, AV - try and refrain from taking it literally.
Witch is it? are or were?
I think my brother hooked that last month when we were fishing on the Tx gulf coast......unfortunately..it is the one that got awayBTW split since no one was willing to take your challenge and show you a crocoduck here I go :> The real crocoduck :>
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0Ze1M4BD12I/SwuHs_6nKHI/AAAAAAAAAC8/l65ebY7oiDk/s400/duckcroc.jpg
Nope. Secular reason wins again. The bible is horribly outdated. Its a good thing people don't use the bible to make many of their choices in life as they did back then. If they did, christians would be persecuting people they call witches and burning them just like they have done in history.Good -- then you won't be wondering why Christians aren't out burning witches?
Borrowing one of my lines, are you?Its a good thing people don't use the bible to make many of their choices in life as they did back then. If they did, christians would be persecuting people they call witches and burning them just like they have done in history.
Riiight.Christians have already shown how they would act if they ran the world as proof of witch burnings and the crusades. its sad to watch you pointing your finger at scientists and blame them for what Christians have already done.
Ha! I have seen all your examples before. You blame poor engineering on scientists when it is the fault of engineer and you blame bad drugs on scientists when they have no control over the product distribution or when its released.Riiight.
If I point my finger at scientists, I can point at something more potent than [today's so-called] witchcraft.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?