Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Should Secession be an option?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SoldierOfTheKing" data-source="post: 62048653" data-attributes="member: 136506"><p>How many people expected it to fall when it did, though?</p><p></p><p>How sustainable is a model that has involves the government borrowing almost half the money it spends? This what is so ridiculous about these arguments that succession would never work because the states need federal money. First, there's no such thing as federal money, because Washington gets its money from sources that lie inside the states. Second, because the way things are going, Washington is not going to have all that money at some point, it can't keep borrowing forever. So the very reasons given why succession is impossible, are in fact why it's inevitable. It's not imminent, but give it another twenty or thirty years and it won't seem farfetched at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SoldierOfTheKing, post: 62048653, member: 136506"] How many people expected it to fall when it did, though? How sustainable is a model that has involves the government borrowing almost half the money it spends? This what is so ridiculous about these arguments that succession would never work because the states need federal money. First, there's no such thing as federal money, because Washington gets its money from sources that lie inside the states. Second, because the way things are going, Washington is not going to have all that money at some point, it can't keep borrowing forever. So the very reasons given why succession is impossible, are in fact why it's inevitable. It's not imminent, but give it another twenty or thirty years and it won't seem farfetched at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Should Secession be an option?
Top
Bottom