Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
= city officials brought judgement for leading Jerusalem in the way of wickedness. = nothing to do with salvation.
I am at a Church where I have many peers and it has a good Sunday school for my children. I have few friends outside Church and no relatives.
I liked my Church because it was a Bible preaching church. I liked the way that preaching was based on the Bible and not on what others make of it.. eg Calvin.
I have in recent weeks been aware of Calvinistic teachings being uttered more than once. I've read a book on Calvinism and fail to see how Calvin concluded what he did. I look at the same verses and see it differently. Should I ignore this? I'm a huge fan of Proverbs 3:5-6 and trust more what the Lord teaches than any doctrine of man. I also don't want to have itchy ears and seek out preachers who say what I want them too.
Please advise and pray for wisdom. There aren't many options of other Churches around.
The born again Jews all repented and joined the New Covenant.
It was directed at the city officials in Jerusalem who hindered repentance by the wicked unbelievers. Resulting in the 70 AD destruction of Jerusalem. = nothing to do with salvation.How do you as a Calvinist interpret Jesus' statement of "how often I have longed to gather your children together as a hen protects her chicks beneath her wings, but you wouldn't let me."?
No, but many were born again and joined the New Covenant.That's a head-scratching statement for me Brother. So you believe that it just so happens that everyone Jesus said that statement to were all ones he chose for salvation? That seems like quite a stretch.
Jesus was teaching the Galilean Jews in their synagogues and villages for he was sent to the lost sheep of Israel. Jesus' neighbors were aware miracles were happening, yet many did not believe they were supposed to help Jesus.No, but many were born again and joined the New Covenant.
It was directed at the city officials in Jerusalem who hindered repentance by the wicked unbelievers. Resulting in the 70 AD destruction of Jerusalem. = nothing to do with salvation.
No, but many were born again and joined the New Covenant.
I am at a Church where I have many peers and it has a good Sunday school for my children. I have few friends outside Church and no relatives.
I liked my Church because it was a Bible preaching church. I liked the way that preaching was based on the Bible and not on what others make of it.. eg Calvin.
I have in recent weeks been aware of Calvinistic teachings being uttered more than once. I've read a book on Calvinism and fail to see how Calvin concluded what he did. I look at the same verses and see it differently. Should I ignore this? I'm a huge fan of Proverbs 3:5-6 and trust more what the Lord teaches than any doctrine of man. I also don't want to have itchy ears and seek out preachers who say what I want them too.
Please advise and pray for wisdom. There aren't many options of other Churches around.
If you understand that the law was for wicked unbelievers. And their obedience brought temporal physical blessing. And their disobedience brought wrath and national destruction, the passage about averting judgement on Jerusalem will make sense. Otherwise you will confuse it with salvation which always pertained only to the faithful. Please spend some time looking into this.The city officials in Jerusalem hindered repentance? If, according to your Calvinistic belief, God chooses who to save, How could they hinder repentance? Wouldn't hindering repentance be impossible since God, by your belief, will force his people to believe?
You said "many" were born again and joined the New Covenant. So when Jesus said “The Kingdom of God is near! Repent of your sins and believe the Good News!” there was a portion of his audience that couldn't obey what he was commanding. So if that is the case, would that not make Jesus a liar because he was commanding some to do something they could not do?
Only the born again Jews received Christ. The signs and wonders only produced "sight faith" that could not save. But they healed the believers and provided evidence that Jesus is God.Jesus was teaching the Galilean Jews in their synagogues and villages for he was sent to the lost sheep of Israel. Jesus' neighbors were aware miracles were happening, yet many did not believe they were supposed to help Jesus.
Matthew 11:21 "Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty works had been done in Tyre and Sidon which were done in you, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes." (World English Bible - Public Domain)
Chorazin and Bethsaida were within a few miles of Capernaum and yet they did not repent. The sheep must follow the shepherd in order to be led to pasture and still waters. The sheep who strike out on their own are likely lost.
They wanted to stone Jesus because the law of Moses commanded them to stone someone who works on the Sabbath. Jesus' healing and certain other activities brought accusations of Sabbath violations. The law was threat of death to those who healed on the Sabbath in the name of the Lord; thus Paul disputed the validity of the law in some of his letters. Whether or not Calvin wrote about this does not concern me, for I do not need Calvin to read these things for myself.
I am at a Church where I have many peers and it has a good Sunday school for my children. I have few friends outside Church and no relatives.
I liked my Church because it was a Bible preaching church. I liked the way that preaching was based on the Bible and not on what others make of it.. eg Calvin.
I have in recent weeks been aware of Calvinistic teachings being uttered more than once. I've read a book on Calvinism and fail to see how Calvin concluded what he did. I look at the same verses and see it differently. Should I ignore this? I'm a huge fan of Proverbs 3:5-6 and trust more what the Lord teaches than any doctrine of man. I also don't want to have itchy ears and seek out preachers who say what I want them too.
Please advise and pray for wisdom. There aren't many options of other Churches around.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?