Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Should Amazon Web services remove Twitter?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Halbhh" data-source="post: 75679610" data-attributes="member: 375234"><p>Tall73, since the relevant part of 230 for sites like Twitter, Facebook, (or even a future incarnation of Parler it would seem) is section (c)(2), with its "good faith" requirement, it's what I'm focused on.</p><p></p><p>The heart of the issue for moderated sites, most of the time, is whether they moderate in good faith.</p><p></p><p>I just began to search up on c2 good faith in some new ways, and here's one. But I'll be looking to see more than just 1 or 2 instances on "good faith".</p><p></p><p><em>"Good faith means that the ISP did not make the decision with the intent to defraud or otherwise facilitate illegal activity."</em></p><p><em><a href="https://www.minclaw.com/legal-resource-center/what-is-section-230-of-the-communication-decency-act-cda/" target="_blank">Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act – Minc Law</a></em></p><p><em></em></p><p>Here the idea is intent. For instance, what was the intent of Parler, what is the intent of Facebook?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Halbhh, post: 75679610, member: 375234"] Tall73, since the relevant part of 230 for sites like Twitter, Facebook, (or even a future incarnation of Parler it would seem) is section (c)(2), with its "good faith" requirement, it's what I'm focused on. The heart of the issue for moderated sites, most of the time, is whether they moderate in good faith. I just began to search up on c2 good faith in some new ways, and here's one. But I'll be looking to see more than just 1 or 2 instances on "good faith". [I]"Good faith means that the ISP did not make the decision with the intent to defraud or otherwise facilitate illegal activity." [URL='https://www.minclaw.com/legal-resource-center/what-is-section-230-of-the-communication-decency-act-cda/']Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act – Minc Law[/URL] [/I] Here the idea is intent. For instance, what was the intent of Parler, what is the intent of Facebook? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Should Amazon Web services remove Twitter?
Top
Bottom