Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Should Amazon Web services remove Twitter?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tall73" data-source="post: 75679456" data-attributes="member: 125574"><p>Their policy was to allow legal speech. They did not allow incitement etc. in their rules, so that doesn't seem it would apply.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There have been many suits that attempt to argue around based on the above. For instance, some have argued that algorithms that promote content, etc. contribute to. In most cases these have not been upheld. In fact your source indicates that out of hundreds only a few have.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you want a good place to read about individual cases and attempts to argue around, check this out:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/07/second-circuit-issues-powerful-section-230-win-to-facebook-in-material-support-for-terrorists-case-force-v-facebook.htm" target="_blank">Second Circuit Issues Powerful Section 230 Win to Facebook in "Material Support for Terrorists" Case-Force v. Facebook - Technology & Marketing Law Blog</a></p><p></p><p>The linked case talks about how Facebook was not held responsible for terrorist organizing on their platform, and reviews the previous similar situations.</p><p></p><p>Clearly terrorism is against federal law, but it is the terrorist that is subject to the law.</p><p></p><p>If you look to the side of the blog he covers a lot of other cases by category. And the story links to a number of related section 230 cases.</p><p></p><p>This is not a one-off case. Notice his linked discussion of failed cases alleging material support of terrorists.</p><p></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/eleventh-lawsuit-against-social-media-providers-for-materially-supporting-terrorists-fails-palmucci-v-twitter.htm" target="_blank">Eleventh Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Palmucci v. Twitter</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/another-appellate-court-rejects-material-support-for-terrorist-claims-against-social-media-platforms-crosby-v-twitter.htm" target="_blank">Another Appellate Court Rejects “Material Support for Terrorist” Claims Against Social Media Platforms–Crosby v. Twitter</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/03/tenth-lawsuit-against-social-media-providers-for-materially-supporting-terrorists-fails-sinclair-v-twitter.htm" target="_blank">Tenth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Sinclair v. Twitter</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/01/ninth-lawsuit-against-social-media-providers-for-materially-supporting-terrorists-fails-clayborn-v-twitter.htm" target="_blank">Ninth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Clayborn v. Twitter</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/12/eighth-lawsuit-against-social-media-providers-for-materially-supporting-terrorists-fails-copeland-v-twitter.htm" target="_blank">Eighth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Copeland v. Twitter</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/10/seventh-different-lawsuit-against-social-media-providers-for-material-support-for-terrorists-fails-taamneh-v-twitter.htm" target="_blank">Seventh Different Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Material Support to Terrorists” Fails–Taamneh v. Twitter</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/10/another-social-media-material-support-to-terrorists-lawsuit-fails-cain-v-twitter.htm" target="_blank">Another Social Media “Material Support to Terrorists” Lawsuit Fails–Cain v. Twitter</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/08/material-support-for-terrorists-lawsuit-against-youtube-fails-again-gonzalez-v-google.htm" target="_blank">“Material Support for Terrorists” Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails Again–Gonzalez v. Google</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/04/fifth-court-rejects-material-support-for-terrorism-claims-against-social-media-sites-crosby-v-twitter.htm" target="_blank">Fifth Court Rejects ‘Material Support for Terrorism’ Claims Against Social Media Sites–Crosby v. Twitter</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/01/twitter-didnt-cause-isis-inspired-terrorism-fields-v-twitter.htm" target="_blank">Twitter Didn’t Cause ISIS-Inspired Terrorism–Fields v. Twitter</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/01/section-230-again-preempts-suit-against-facebook-for-supporting-terrorists-force-v-facebook.htm" target="_blank">Section 230 Again Preempts Suit Against Facebook for Supporting Terrorists–Force v. Facebook</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/12/fourth-judge-says-social-media-sites-arent-liable-for-supporting-terrorists-pennie-v-twitter.htm" target="_blank">Fourth Judge Says Social Media Sites Aren’t Liable for Supporting Terrorists–Pennie v. Twitter</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/10/gonzalezvgoogle.htm" target="_blank">Another Court Rejects ‘Material Support To Terrorists’ Claims Against Social Media Sites–Gonzalez v. Google</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/05/facebook-defeats-lawsuit-over-material-support-for-terrorists-cohen-v-facebook.htm" target="_blank">Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Material Support for Terrorists–Cohen v. Facebook</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/11/twitter-defeats-isis-material-support-lawsuit-again-fields-v-twitter.htm" target="_blank">Twitter Defeats ISIS “Material Support” Lawsuit Again–Fields v. Twitter</a></p><p>* <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/08/section-230-immunizes-twitter-from-liability-for-isiss-terrorist-activities-fields-v-twitter.htm" target="_blank">Section 230 Immunizes Twitter From Liability For ISIS’s Terrorist Activities–Fields v. Twitter</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tall73, post: 75679456, member: 125574"] Their policy was to allow legal speech. They did not allow incitement etc. in their rules, so that doesn't seem it would apply. There have been many suits that attempt to argue around based on the above. For instance, some have argued that algorithms that promote content, etc. contribute to. In most cases these have not been upheld. In fact your source indicates that out of hundreds only a few have. If you want a good place to read about individual cases and attempts to argue around, check this out: [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/07/second-circuit-issues-powerful-section-230-win-to-facebook-in-material-support-for-terrorists-case-force-v-facebook.htm']Second Circuit Issues Powerful Section 230 Win to Facebook in "Material Support for Terrorists" Case-Force v. Facebook - Technology & Marketing Law Blog[/URL] The linked case talks about how Facebook was not held responsible for terrorist organizing on their platform, and reviews the previous similar situations. Clearly terrorism is against federal law, but it is the terrorist that is subject to the law. If you look to the side of the blog he covers a lot of other cases by category. And the story links to a number of related section 230 cases. This is not a one-off case. Notice his linked discussion of failed cases alleging material support of terrorists. * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/eleventh-lawsuit-against-social-media-providers-for-materially-supporting-terrorists-fails-palmucci-v-twitter.htm']Eleventh Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Palmucci v. Twitter[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/another-appellate-court-rejects-material-support-for-terrorist-claims-against-social-media-platforms-crosby-v-twitter.htm']Another Appellate Court Rejects “Material Support for Terrorist” Claims Against Social Media Platforms–Crosby v. Twitter[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/03/tenth-lawsuit-against-social-media-providers-for-materially-supporting-terrorists-fails-sinclair-v-twitter.htm']Tenth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Sinclair v. Twitter[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/01/ninth-lawsuit-against-social-media-providers-for-materially-supporting-terrorists-fails-clayborn-v-twitter.htm']Ninth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Clayborn v. Twitter[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/12/eighth-lawsuit-against-social-media-providers-for-materially-supporting-terrorists-fails-copeland-v-twitter.htm']Eighth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Copeland v. Twitter[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/10/seventh-different-lawsuit-against-social-media-providers-for-material-support-for-terrorists-fails-taamneh-v-twitter.htm']Seventh Different Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Material Support to Terrorists” Fails–Taamneh v. Twitter[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/10/another-social-media-material-support-to-terrorists-lawsuit-fails-cain-v-twitter.htm']Another Social Media “Material Support to Terrorists” Lawsuit Fails–Cain v. Twitter[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/08/material-support-for-terrorists-lawsuit-against-youtube-fails-again-gonzalez-v-google.htm']“Material Support for Terrorists” Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails Again–Gonzalez v. Google[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/04/fifth-court-rejects-material-support-for-terrorism-claims-against-social-media-sites-crosby-v-twitter.htm']Fifth Court Rejects ‘Material Support for Terrorism’ Claims Against Social Media Sites–Crosby v. Twitter[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/01/twitter-didnt-cause-isis-inspired-terrorism-fields-v-twitter.htm']Twitter Didn’t Cause ISIS-Inspired Terrorism–Fields v. Twitter[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/01/section-230-again-preempts-suit-against-facebook-for-supporting-terrorists-force-v-facebook.htm']Section 230 Again Preempts Suit Against Facebook for Supporting Terrorists–Force v. Facebook[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/12/fourth-judge-says-social-media-sites-arent-liable-for-supporting-terrorists-pennie-v-twitter.htm']Fourth Judge Says Social Media Sites Aren’t Liable for Supporting Terrorists–Pennie v. Twitter[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/10/gonzalezvgoogle.htm']Another Court Rejects ‘Material Support To Terrorists’ Claims Against Social Media Sites–Gonzalez v. Google[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/05/facebook-defeats-lawsuit-over-material-support-for-terrorists-cohen-v-facebook.htm']Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Material Support for Terrorists–Cohen v. Facebook[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/11/twitter-defeats-isis-material-support-lawsuit-again-fields-v-twitter.htm']Twitter Defeats ISIS “Material Support” Lawsuit Again–Fields v. Twitter[/URL] * [URL='https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/08/section-230-immunizes-twitter-from-liability-for-isiss-terrorist-activities-fields-v-twitter.htm']Section 230 Immunizes Twitter From Liability For ISIS’s Terrorist Activities–Fields v. Twitter[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Should Amazon Web services remove Twitter?
Top
Bottom