Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Should Amazon Web services remove Twitter?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Halbhh" data-source="post: 75677987" data-attributes="member: 375234"><p>Until it's clear that "good faith" isn't required, and also that it wouldn't even matter if AWS becomes definitely aware of assassination attempt plans, for example, then AWS cannot correctly continue to provide services to Parler.</p><p></p><p>But in addition to my understanding of losing 230 protection without acting in good faith, which might be incorrect, there is another more compelling reason.</p><p></p><p>It is morally wrong to provide services to Parler, so long as they are not really doing much to prevent the planning of crimes, murders, etc. on their forum. (just one possible example: failing to use standard tools to prevent illegal posts)</p><p></p><p>Basically Parler's business model isn't functional in the U.S. as far as I can tell. I cannot provide a forum for people to plan murders and then 'try' to moderate it, but fail to do so up to the <em>normal prevailing standards.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Halbhh, post: 75677987, member: 375234"] Until it's clear that "good faith" isn't required, and also that it wouldn't even matter if AWS becomes definitely aware of assassination attempt plans, for example, then AWS cannot correctly continue to provide services to Parler. But in addition to my understanding of losing 230 protection without acting in good faith, which might be incorrect, there is another more compelling reason. It is morally wrong to provide services to Parler, so long as they are not really doing much to prevent the planning of crimes, murders, etc. on their forum. (just one possible example: failing to use standard tools to prevent illegal posts) Basically Parler's business model isn't functional in the U.S. as far as I can tell. I cannot provide a forum for people to plan murders and then 'try' to moderate it, but fail to do so up to the [I]normal prevailing standards.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Should Amazon Web services remove Twitter?
Top
Bottom