Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Should Amazon Web services remove Twitter?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tall73" data-source="post: 75677951" data-attributes="member: 125574"><p>No, again, I cited the case where even notification did not make them liable.</p><p></p><p>You are reading the good faith from one provision to the other.</p><p></p><p>This provision has been interpreted broadly:</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #006600">(1) Treatment of publisher or speaker </span></p><p><span style="color: #006600">No provider or user of an <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=47-USC-1900800046-1237841278&term_occur=999&term_src=" target="_blank">interactive computer service</a> shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=47-USC-10252844-1237841279&term_occur=999&term_src=title:47:chapter:5:subchapter:II:part:I:section:230" target="_blank">information content provider</a>.</span></p><p></p><p>As the article I cited earlier noted it does not depend on Scienter, or "knowledge of wrongdoing".</p><p></p><p>The good faith language comes into play with the second provision:</p><p></p><p>(2) <span style="color: #006600">Civil liability</span></p><p><span style="color: #006600"><strong>No provider or user of an <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=47-USC-1900800046-1237841278&term_occur=999&term_src=" target="_blank">interactive computer service</a> shall be held liable on account of— </strong></span></p><p><span style="color: #006600">(A) </span></p><p> <span style="color: #006600">any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or</span></p><p><span style="color: #006600"> </span></p><p><span style="color: #006600">(B) </span></p><p> <span style="color: #006600">any action taken to enable or make available to <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=47-USC-10252844-1237841279&term_occur=999&term_src=title:47:chapter:5:subchapter:II:part:I:section:230" target="_blank">information content providers</a> or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).</span></p><p> <span style="color: #006600"></span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #000000">This provision does NOT say that they must make a good faith effort or they are liable. </span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">Rather, it says that if they make a good faith effort to remove illegal content they won't be penalized for that, and use that as a workaround to say they were publishers. </span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tall73, post: 75677951, member: 125574"] No, again, I cited the case where even notification did not make them liable. You are reading the good faith from one provision to the other. This provision has been interpreted broadly: [COLOR=#006600](1) Treatment of publisher or speaker No provider or user of an [URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=47-USC-1900800046-1237841278&term_occur=999&term_src=']interactive computer service[/URL] shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another [URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=47-USC-10252844-1237841279&term_occur=999&term_src=title:47:chapter:5:subchapter:II:part:I:section:230']information content provider[/URL].[/COLOR] As the article I cited earlier noted it does not depend on Scienter, or "knowledge of wrongdoing". The good faith language comes into play with the second provision: (2) [COLOR=#006600]Civil liability [B]No provider or user of an [URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=47-USC-1900800046-1237841278&term_occur=999&term_src=']interactive computer service[/URL] shall be held liable on account of— [/B] (A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or (B) any action taken to enable or make available to [URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=47-USC-10252844-1237841279&term_occur=999&term_src=title:47:chapter:5:subchapter:II:part:I:section:230']information content providers[/URL] or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1). [/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000]This provision does NOT say that they must make a good faith effort or they are liable. Rather, it says that if they make a good faith effort to remove illegal content they won't be penalized for that, and use that as a workaround to say they were publishers. [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Should Amazon Web services remove Twitter?
Top
Bottom