But Avast Anti Software VPN was asking me to choose a fake location and to lie about my IP address. I am not convinced how you don't see that as lying. If they had an option that just encrypted my location and I was hidden, then I would be fine with that. I would not have to actively lie about my IP address or server location.
I am sure there are spy agencies of foreign governments that have asked to obtain sensitive data and they asked one of their covert operatives to fornicate with a person so as to get this data and protect tons of lives. Surely, a spy could justify that what they are doing is good but yet they are sinning in the process.
I really wish Avast had a VPN that did not force me to lie about my server location or IP address. Is there a Anti-Virus software that just says that my IP address is encrypted or hidden instead of saying a fake location?
Paul is not talking about other kinds of sins like lying. There are no exceptions to lying, murder, etc. in Scripture. Paul is referring to how we can eat anything we want and there is nothing impure in itself. Paul is talking about ceremonial laws of the OT that are no longer in effect anymore in the New Covenant and yet we should not do anything to make our fellow brother to stumble if they think these ceremonial laws still apply.
Not really. Some Christian believers in India do not wear wedding rings. So my Indian Christian friend at work here in the States does not wear a wedding ring because in his culture, his group of believers feel jewelry is sometimes over obsessive among the women there and it like an idol. There is also nothing in Scripture that says we have to wear wedding rings, either. So no. It is not lying before God because God never put forth a command to wear rings to show that we are married. It's a commandment of men.
I created a new thread here to show that we are not under the Law of Moses. You can check that out here:
The Law of Moses is no more, but that does not mean the New Covenant is without many commands.
Nowhere in Scripture is this mentioned. If we were to follow the previous chapters, the context is the Law of Moses and Israel, and there is no mention of anything about what you said here. I know. I just quickly went back to the previous chapters and quickly read through them to double confirm this.
Anyways, we can again agree to disagree in love.
Please be well;
And may God bless you.