Can I just say that my answer in the other thread was brief and incomplete; partly because I didn't want to get off topic and partly because I thought the thread was closing anyway (though it hasn't yet.)
This is what I was responding to:
I say a church that tells homosexuals its ok to remain in their sin are leading them straight to hell, and it is an apostate church
and this is what I said:
Not true. (Will discuss in a new thread iof you wish.)
I don't actually know if I believe that homosexuality is a sin or not. I am well aware that the Bible says that God hates it eg Romans 1:27. But I have heard discussion of the view that this can be genetic, and some people who are quite distressed at finding they have feelings for the opposite gender, nevertheless cannot help those feelings. It is also true to say that God hates all sin. Romans 1 goes on to list those who hate, are greedy, envious. gossipers, filled with malice. faithless, ruthless and so on as deserving God's wrath
just as much as those who are guilty of sexual sins. So it seems to me that if someone is going to say that homosexuality is a sin, they should speak out equally strongly against these things. Yet when was the last time we debated whether a man was fit to be ordained because of his jealousy, temper or habit of exaggerating the truth? Or read of people being filled with righteous anger at those who swear and take God's name in vain?
I am not saying that there is no such thing as sin and anything goes, or that we have no right, or duty, to speak out against evil and those who break God's standards. But why single out just one sin? And when we do so, I think it does close the door against ministry, acceptance and showing God's love. Jesus told the woman caught in adultery; go and sin no more. But he didn't say, that sin is disgusting, you're going to hell, I want nothing to do with you. Jesus ate with tax collectors and sinners; demon possessed, lepers and the unclean of society. Equally he called the Pharisees blind guides and whitewashed tombs, but still explained to one of them how to be born again.
The poster in question objected to the fact that the denomination I belong to does not condemn homosexuals for their behaviour, but allows gay people to come to church, receive the sacraments and become members of the body of Christ. Apparently they should be condemning, not tolerating, and failure to do so means they are headed for hell and taking people with them. I do not agree with that. I believe the Gospel is available to all, and we should not condemn others or set ourselves up as judge and jury because they do something that we disagree with.
If the Methodist church was saying "it's fine to carry on sinning, after all you can always confess on Sunday"; or "repentance is out of date, you must do what makes you feel good," or "sin doesn't matter to God"; then this would be more serious. Sin mattered so much to God that he gave the life of his Son for it. But I don't believe the church is saying this.