Several Local Florida GOP websites depict Donald Trump as the current President of the United States

[essentialsaltes]

At least 10 local Republican Party websites across Florida continue to show Donald Trump as the current president of the United States, more than four months after he lost the election to Joe Biden.

Most websites list no elected officials at all, but nearly half of those that do continue to include Trump.

O the coup Manatee.

Four More Years!

 

[SarahsKnight]

To quote a section of the article:
Trump hasn't conceded, and it's our opinion the election was stolen," Kramer, the former mayor of Vero Beach, told the USA TODAY Network-Florida. "It's important to make a statement and to make sure the statement stays relevant for the next 3½ years.


This is just ... so, so sad.

 

[Albion]

At least 10 local Republican Party websites across Florida continue to show Donald Trump as the current president of the United States, more than four months after he lost the election to Joe Biden.

So what? Should offended parties do the usual and doxx or threaten the editors and their families? Or vandalize their property and "get in their faces" at restaurants and elsewhere as certain leaders of the radicals have advocated and their followers have often done?

 

[Desk trauma]

It's gonna be a very long 4-8 years from some people.

What was it they said over and over about feelings? Oh yeah....

 

[DaisyDay]

Yup. And it isn't as though most were not updated to reflect recently elected GOPers.

"Trump hasn't conceded, and it's our opinion the election was stolen," [Jay] Kramer, the former mayor of Vero Beach [and current chair of Indian River County Republican Party], told the USA TODAY Network-Florida. "It's important to make a statement and to make sure the statement stays relevant for the next 3½ years."

 

[DaisyDay]

So what? Should offended parties do the usual and doxx or threaten the editors and their families? Or vandalize their property and "get in their faces" at restaurants and elsewhere as certain leaders of the radicals have advocated and their followers have often done?

What the heck are you talking about? What editors? These are official GOP local websites.

 

[durangodawood]

So what?....

up is down. fantasy is reality. So what?

 

[Albion]

What the heck are you talking about? What editors? These are official GOP local websites.

I'm trying to be patient here. I was referring to the creators and editors of the content of the GOP websites in question, not the media which reported this non-story. Ok, now?

 

[Albion]

up is down. fantasy is reality. So what?

If you say so. I was commenting on the idea of making a big deal out of a REPUBLICAN PARTY website saying something political that the other party might not want to read.

Is the Cancel Culture now going to decide what can and can't be printed there, too?

 

[pescador]

So what? Should offended parties do the usual and doxx or threaten the editors and their families? Or vandalize their property and "get in their faces" at restaurants and elsewhere as certain leaders of the radicals have advocated and their followers have often done?

Are you talking about the many, many violent supporters of the ex-President?

BTW, how does the command to love your neighbor as yourself figure into your spiteful comment?

 

[Albion]

Are you talking about the many, many violent supporters of the ex-President?

BTW, how does the command to love your neighbor as yourself figure into your spiteful comment?

None of that was involved in my comments, one way or the other. You probably knew that.

 

[essentialsaltes]

So what? Should offended parties do the usual and doxx or threaten the editors and their families?

I was commenting on the idea of making a big deal out of a REPUBLICAN PARTY website saying something political that the other party might not want to read.

C'mon, you know it's not a good look to go around trying to undo an election or declaring 'Not My President'. It's even worse for it to be the political party and not some random protestor.

 

[Desk trauma]

Yes, whatever became of "If he's not your president the USA isn't your country"?

 

[ralliann]

So what? Should offended parties do the usual and doxx or threaten the editors and their families? Or vandalize their property and "get in their faces" at restaurants and elsewhere as certain leaders of the radicals have advocated and their followers have often done?

Or as stacy Abrams, refusing to admit defeat in the Georgia race for governor.

 

[durangodawood]

If you say so. I was commenting on the idea of making a big deal out of a REPUBLICAN PARTY website saying something political that the other party might not want to read.

Is the Cancel Culture now going to decide what can and can't be printed there, too?

No it's not "something political that the other party might not want to read."

It's more about the failure to confront reality that so many Trump supporters suffer from.

 

[Albion]

Or as stacy Abrams, refusing to admit defeat in the Georgia race for governor.

Do you have the idea that the journalistic world is incensed because she continues to claim to have won that governorship even though the outcome wasn't even close? They aren't.

If not, then why should a 'tempest in a teapot' of an issue like a local REPUBLICAN website referring to Trump as it did be worth the attention?

 

[Albion]

No it's not "something political that the other party might not want to read."

Apparently, it is.

 

[durangodawood]

Apparently, it is.

But that's trivial. No one should want to read that.

The important point is it's evidence of certain significant portions of Americans living under a great delusion.

 

[Albion]

But that's trivial. No one should want to read that.

Don't read it then. I doubt that it was intended for you in particular anyway. The news release stated that it was a LOCAL website and I made mention of that fact as well.

 

[ralliann]

Do you have the idea that the journalistic world is incensed because she continues to claim to have won that governorship even though the outcome wasn't even close? They aren't.

If not, then why should a 'tempest in a teapot' of an issue like a local REPUBLICAN website referring to Trump as it did be worth the attention?

Hypocrisy is my quess. Just like kids in cages outrage. No outrage now on that either. Suppose it's political?