Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The reason that I have asked you "what tribe do you hail from?" is because the covenant of the ten commandments engraved on stone tables was exclusive to the children of Israel. Reading through all of Deuteronomy 4-5 will make that clear - no one else had them, and not even the generation prior to Moses had them.
Absolutely.So what are the BETTER promises then? Wasn't the promise God gave Abraham perfect already?
I have answered this for you before on CARM.What commandments and torah did Abraham keep?
Absolutely.
Genesis 18:17-18
17: And the LORD said, Shall I hide from Abraham that thing which I do;
18: Seeing that Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him?
VictorC said:I have answered this for you before on CARM.
Pertinent to this topic, it wasn't the covenant given to Moses 430 years later.
Deuteronomy 5:2-3 makes that very clear.
Victor
Your decisions are what you choose to adide by. I don't make them for you, and I am not accountable for them.I don't go to CARM anymore, so humor me....
I won't go back there and haven't been back there since I said I was done. I really am done. It's a pit bull arena.
But Sophia, if you're going to be critical of people that change their minds, I ought to bump some of Tall's dramatic goodbye threads here on CF.
My problem was never with the fact that you changed your mind; it was with the fact that you told me that you hadn't gone back there and hadn't read my posts yourself even though I knew that you had because I had seen OneYellowSock there.
Sophia....your problem IS with the fact that I changed my mind, but you have to say differently or the reflection comes back on someone within your own household.
Your soliciting for people to come here was BEFORE I signed on as OneYellowSock...check the dates.
I was PMd with your comments, and I did not originally see them myself.
I went to CARM to check it out for myself and I really won't be back....but I did originally change my mind about going there...so SUE me!
Your decisions are what you choose to adide by. I don't make them for you, and I am not accountable for them.
Your responses have devolved to the point that there is little relation to either the OP or to the reponse that I wrote near the top of the thread.
VictorC said:So, please allow me to cut through the chase and get to the bottom line. The foundation for the thought you present isn't coming from the Scriptures - it is coming from Ellen White. Even though you haven't read her writings (as you have claimed before), you are instructed according to the fundamental beliefs of the SDA church. Imbedded in Fundamental Belief #10 is the undefined coded phrase "law of love". You can search the Bible from cover to cover and never figure out what this means. However, this joins several other fundies that are rooted in Ellen instead of the Bible:
VictorC said:The yoke that binds to service is the law of God. The great law of love revealed in Eden, proclaimed upon Sinai, and in the new covenant written in the heart, is that which binds the human worker to the will of God. If we were left to follow our own inclinations, to go just where our will would lead us, we should fall into Satan's snare, and become possessors of his attributes. Therefore, God confines us to His will, which is high, noble, elevating. He desires that we shall patiently and wisely take up the duties of service. {ST, June 29, 1904 par. 4}
VictorC said:It isn't hard to identify this "law of love" as the ten commandments, from the qualification that it was proclaimed at Sinai. This same "law of love" is what Paul called the "ministration of death" in 2 Corinthians 3:7, which makes Ellen hard to reconcile with Paul.
VictorC said:According to Ellen, the covenant proclaimed at Sinai existed in Eden.
Deuteronomy 5:2-3
2: The LORD our God made a covenant with us in Horeb.
3: The LORD made not this covenant with our fathers, but with us, even us, who are all of us here alive this day.
According to Moses' own words, Ellen was wrong.
According to Ellen, the covenant proclaimed at Sinai is what's transferred into the hearts of the believer in the new covenant.
Jeremiah 31:31-32
31: Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
32: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD.
According to Jeremiah and the Word he received as "thus saith the LORD", Ellen was wrong. The new covenant isn't related to the old one from Sinai, the one taken away according to Hebrews 10:9.
Ezekiel reversed the role of the law and God's Spirit, saying that His Spirit was to enter us, and from that we would follow His judgments (Ezekiel 36:27). Yet it is an allusion to the same prophecy given to Jeremiah and quoted in Hebrews.
These are all points I had mentioned in my original post.
Yet you haven't addressed these.
Instead, you defend the writings of Ellen White that you were taught as a new Adventist, and you weren't told where these peculiar teachings came from.
Needless to say, they aren't Biblical.
Victor
I never told people to come here--not that it would matter because it's not against the rules. I don't care if you changed your mind.
The Ten Commandments are not multipal choice.