• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Sean Penn's Speech

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

SughaNSpice

Guest
I wish I could find the thread that was going on a while ago. It wasn’t my argument, so I can’t remember things exactly, but several Christian posters showed that the word arsenokoites which is translated as homosexual doesn’t mean homosexual as we understand it today, but those who use male prositutes. It condemns as specific homosexual act, but not the orientation or the majotity of relationships. I think we can both agree that prostitution isn’t a good thing.

If I am reading my notes on those posts right it isn’t even about male prostitution. Something about the gender tense of word itself indicates it is good old fashioned male on female prostitution
 
Upvote 0
S

SughaNSpice

Guest
At the risk of appearing to be anti-same sex marriage I must point out that all rights are voted on. Our Constitution and the Bill of Rights were voted on. Every amendment to the constitution since the Bill of Rights also had to be voted upon. Universally held Rights do not just pop up to be recognized.
The supreme court doesn’t agree with you. They have ruled that the rights of a minority cannot be voted away
 
Upvote 0

KCKID

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2008
1,867
228
Australia
✟4,479.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Phinehas2 said:
No mention of loving monogamous relationships in the Bible except man and woman

And those are pretty few

Does the Bible reference even ONE 'loving' monogamous relationship?

It would appear that the emphasis we of today put on 'love and marriage' was very different some 2000-odd years ago. In fact, that some Christians seem to be so desirous of applying the culture and traditions of those days to we of 2009 is absolutely senseless.
 
Upvote 0

KCKID

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2008
1,867
228
Australia
✟4,479.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
If I am reading my notes on those posts right it isn’t even about male prostitution. Something about the gender tense of word itself indicates it is good old fashioned male on female prostitution

So, the point you are making is that NO ONE appears to be 100% clear as to what certain scriptures are referring to? I agree and this is why I call out those who use such ambiguous texts with such self-righteous authority as to condemn thousands and thousands of innocent people to some equally ambiguous 'eternal punishment'.

Is this REALLY what Christianity is meant to be? I think not.
 
Upvote 0

Beanieboy

Senior Veteran
Jan 20, 2006
6,297
1,214
62
✟65,132.00
Faith
Christian

I wish I could find the thread that was going on a while ago. It wasn’t my argument, so I can’t remember things exactly, but several Christian posters showed that the word arsenokoites which is translated as homosexual doesn’t mean homosexual as we understand it today, but those who use male prositutes.


http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_bibh5.htm
http://www.geocities.com/westhollywood/heights/7608/levit.htm
http://www.soulforce.org/article/homosexuality-bible-gay-christian
 
Upvote 0

Beanieboy

Senior Veteran
Jan 20, 2006
6,297
1,214
62
✟65,132.00
Faith
Christian
So, the point you are making is that NO ONE appears to be 100% clear as to what certain scriptures are referring to? I agree and this is why I call out those who use such ambiguous texts with such self-righteous authority as to condemn thousands and thousands of innocent people to some equally ambiguous 'eternal punishment'.

Is this REALLY what Christianity is meant to be? I think not.

I think there are a couple of people here that are 100% sure what things mean. Should we consult them?
Magic 8 Ball...?
 
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
31,204
15,673
Seattle
✟1,249,535.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Does the Bible reference even ONE 'loving' monogamous relationship?

It would appear that the emphasis we of today put on 'love and marriage' was very different some 2000-odd years ago. In fact, that some Christians seem to be so desirous of applying the culture and traditions of those days to we of 2009 is absolutely senseless.

I know. It's really hard to resist the temptation to offer them 2 goats for their 12 year old daughter to see how upset they would get.
 
Upvote 0

LightHorseman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2006
8,123
363
✟10,643.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
AU-Liberals
For you perhaps, but as you don’t seem to believe the medical and scientific evidence I don’t think it matters for you anyway. For me I don’t need outside Biblical evidence anyway.
He says that now, but I bet he's wearing mixed fibre garments and takes antibiotics when he's sick.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.