How did you come to the conclusion tha the Roman Catholic Church was "the Original Church founded by Christ"?
How do you know this? Without the objective standard of scripture, how do you know the things the Catholic Church is telling you are really the Word of God? How do you know they're true without the objective standard of scripture to compare them to?
How gave you the idea that this passage refers to Purgatory? In reality, it refers to the Bema Seat Judgement and those who stand before this judgement are already saved. Why would they have to have their sins purged? And if this is Purgatory, then where does the passage say anything about sinners expiating their sins?
As with the last passage, how did you come to the conclusion that this passage is about Purgatory? This is the danger we face when we try to derive our doctrine from parables.
Remember, a parable isn't a literal account or a prescriptive passage, but is a story used as a rhetorical device to illustrate a spiritual truth. In this case, in this case, forgiveness.
Please note that you chose to begin the passage in v 23, which begins with the word "therefore". Any time you see the word "therefore", that tells you that the author or speaker is summarizing an important point. The previous verses would have told you what this passage is referring to.
Again, how do you find Purgatory in this verse?
TruthHurts, when it comes down to it, we both believe in Purgatory. The only difference is that you believe the Roman Catholic teaching that it is up to sinners to purge themselves of their sins, while we believe the purging was done by Christ in His atonement on the cross.
But doesn't 1 John 1:7 tell us that it's the blood of Christ that cleanses us from all sin? If His blood has cleansed us from all sin, then what sins are left?
Where does the Bible make that distinction?
Yes.
So, when Paul called people "saints", he was addressing people in Heaven?
How do you know? How do you know he's out now?
Who does Jesus say is not bad enough to be in eternal torment?
Is that why you believe that Christ founded a religious body that did not even exist until after His ascension?
I find that a little hard to believe, as you simply cannot teach Western Civ without devoting weeks to church history
And what was your background in history that gave you the ability to do this?
Should we believe everything you say?
i dont have time to read, much less answer, your entire post... will try to save it on my f-drive... read later..
but there are many ansers to the Q of How do you know this?
books, the Bible, the Church... common sense, EXPERIENCE (that greatest of all teachers besides Christ Himself) and...
the Holy Spirit
true, one cannot always tell absolutely what is being said by the HS and what is said by (whomever)... but... well, sometimes one cannot prove how one KNOWS something... but one knows just the same..
anyway...
you say how do i know "without the objective standard of the" Bible?
do you assume i dont know the Bible?
i have read the entire thing, some parts far more than once... (the NT)
i have had the Word READ to me at daily Mass for years and years...
anywya, again, i will answer the ot her stuff later.
But i have to say.. you protestants are VERY (most of you) against the Original Church... can't quite figure that one out... although i do know that Satan attacks the true Christians and their Church far mor than any other... jusst stands to reason since he said tht we would be "hated by all" ... because of HIm (St Mk 13 and other pgsg)
anyway... i guess its that nearly 500 yrs of protestant indoctrination..
that is rather a long time to be separated from the original truth.
i am going to try to find the book by Cardinal Newman who said that to be deep into history is to cease being protestant.. have been meaning to read that one 4 some time.. God bless