Scientists on the Moon

[AV1611VET]

I have a suggestion for by brothers and sisters in Christ.

Until scientists settle once and for all how we got our moon (from about seven different hypotheses), let's go with what the Bible says.

Then, when scientists finally do settle on [what they think is] the right one; let's just say -- by faith -- they are wrong.

Agree or disagree?

Go with what God says, or what man says?

 

[AirPo]

Either way, you wind up with what man says.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I have a suggestion for by brothers and sisters in Christ.

Until scientists settle once and for all how we got our moon (from about seven different hypotheses), let's go with what the Bible says.

Then, when scientists finally do settle on [what they think is] the right one; let's just say -- by faith -- they are wrong.

Agree or disagree?

Go with what God says, or what man says?

Sorry, but that is a false standard. And where the Moon came from has very little to do with the theory of evolution. Last if it was answered you and your kind would only move the goal posts once again.

Here is another suggestion. Try being honest with yourself for once. It is amazing how the scales fall from your eyes once you quite lying to yourself.

And if you want to claim the Bible is "What God says". You are going to need a heaping portion of evidence to support that claim. Right now we can only say it is a book written by man.

 

[AV1611VET]

Until scientists settle once and for all how we got our moon ...

And where the Moon came from ...

Now there's a standard tactic you guys use MADE IN CHINA.*

* Chinese whispers -- get it?

 

[AV1611VET]

Since you're dying to take this thread off-topic (since I'm making a good point), I'll be glad to accommodate you.

And where the Moon came from has very little to do with the theory of evolution.

I disagree.

Ever head of cosmic evolution? stellar evolution? chemical evolution?

No such animals in your vocabulary, I take it?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Since you're dying to take this thread off-topic (since I'm making a good point), I'll be glad to accommodate you.

I disagree.

Ever head of cosmic evolution? stellar evolution? chemical evolution?

No such animals in your vocabulary, I take it?

Only from a convicted tax cheat and liar.

I try not to use incorrect terminology.

 

[AV1611VET]

Only from a convicted tax cheat and liar.

Do you mean Wikipedia, the University of Michigan, or Kent Hovind?

I try not to use incorrect terminology.

Perhaps you go overboard?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Do you mean Wikipedia, the University of Michigan, or Kent Hovind?

Perhaps you go overboard?

You are still wrong in the sense that you are lumping biological evolution with other processes. Of course what you are doing now is a playing a word game.

And it shows how little the Ten Commandments mean to you since it is an inherently dishonest attack.

One more time, why do atheists always have to point out to creationists when they are breaking their own rules? I don't see that problem with other Christians very often, it seems to be a failing of mainly creationists.

 

[AV1611VET]

You are still wrong ...

LOL

I'm the one in the wrong, despite the fact that I corrected you with Wikipedia and U of Michigan?

Solid aurum.

 

[Subduction Zone]

LOL

I'm the one in the wrong, despite the fact that I corrected you with Wikipedia and U of Michigan?

Solid aurum.

AV, yes, you are always wrong here. If not in detail at the very least in intention.

As I have said many many times, try debating honestly for once.

In fact here is a question for you:

Why can't creationists argue honestly? That means no word games. No quoting out of context. No use of false web sites? I know the answer do you?

 

[AV1611VET]

AV, yes, you are always wrong here.

What tipped you off (in your opinion)?

My beliefs, or my faith icon?

 

[Paulos23]

What tipped you off (in your opinion)?

My beliefs, or my faith icon?

The words you use.

 

[AV1611VET]

The words you use.

Well if Jesus couldn't open His mouth w/o being wrong in you guys' eyes, I can do the same.

(Gandhi quote in three ... two ... one ...)

 

[Subduction Zone]

What tipped you off (in your opinion)?

My beliefs, or my faith icon?

Your posts tipped me off. I don't care about your personal beliefs. I care about your dishonest debating methods.

Is honesty that difficult? You should not need word games if your views are true and correct. You should not need false sites if your views are true and correct. Your debating method is an open admission that you are wrong.

 

[AV1611VET]

I care about your dishonest debating methods.

I think now would be a good time to make a plea to get back on topic.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I think now would be a good time to make a plea to get back on topic.

If you are apologizing then I agree.

 

[Split Rock]

I have a suggestion for by brothers and sisters in Christ.

Until scientists settle once and for all how we got our moon (from about seven different hypotheses), let's go with what the Bible says.

Then, when scientists finally do settle on [what they think is] the right one; let's just say -- by faith -- they are wrong.

Agree or disagree?

Go with what God says, or what man says?

Either way, you wind up with what man says.

BINGO!

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

I have a suggestion for by brothers and sisters in Christ.

Until scientists settle once and for all how we got our moon (from about seven different hypotheses), let's go with what the Bible says.

Then, when scientists finally do settle on [what they think is] the right one; let's just say -- by faith -- they are wrong.

Agree or disagree?

Go with what God says, or what man says?

The science articles I read have all seemed to settle down on the moon being the result of a collision between the proto-earth and a Mars size body between 4 and 5 billion years ago.

Do you have any current (within the past 10 years) alternate suggestions?

 

[florida2]

The science articles I read have all seemed to settle down on the moon being the result of a collision between the proto-earth and a Mars size body between 4 and 5 billion years ago.

Do you have any current (within the past 10 years) alternate suggestions?

It's part of common dishonest tactics:

Scientists aren't completely sure about something = scientists know nothing and evolution is wrong

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

Well if Jesus couldn't open His mouth w/o being wrong in you guys' eyes, I can do the same.

(Gandhi quote in three ... two ... one ...)

Ah, but there came a time when Jesus' critics stopped asking Him questions because of the wisdom of His answers.

You haven't reached that point, yet.