- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,758
- 52,536
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
They don't need a lab.You are welcome to prove a fish becomes a cat in a lab for me.
Do what on paper?They don't need a lab.
They can do it on paper.
Connect the dots.Do what on paper?
The pattern of genetic relatedness and the fossil record demonstrates the common ancestry of fish and cats... I'm curious why those results don't count?You are welcome to prove a fish becomes a cat in a lab for me.
It's dishonest for you to pretend that you care about scientific evidence on this matter.Connect the dots.
From a fish to a cat.
This is one of my favorite pictures:
Each one of those black lines underneath those pictures (blue lines on Richard Dawkin's video) glosses over hundreds and hundreds of missing links.
Just play connect-the-dots, and you can show evolution on paper.
Show me how it is done. show breed two fish in a lab and get me something other than a fish.The pattern of genetic relatedness and the fossil record demonstrates the common ancestry of fish and cats... I'm curious why those results don't count?
What scientific evidence?It's dishonest for you to pretend that you care about scientific evidence on this matter.
Um ... no.Shemjaza said:This is very clearly in your "Bible says X" category ...
That's right.Shemjaza said:... so you would still not accept science if one million perfect fossil apes with intact DNA was presented.
See also:It breaks the DNA concatenation that evolution relies on, and shows that, when God created animals "after their kind," that God created them as separate species (or families).
In other words, He created cats, dogs, giraffes, elephants, and so on according to their distinct characteristics.
Only on paper.
...
And while I applaud your concatenation skills, your history is full of more holes than Clyde Barrow.
If you can't prove it in a laboratory then you plainly just have to believe it.
It's dishonest for you to pretend that you care about scientific evidence on this matter.
This is very clearly in your "Bible says X" category so you would still not accept science if one million perfect fossil apes with intact DNA was presented.
That's why it's still a mystery, isn't it?Virtually all of the work on abiogenesis is done in laboratories, especially the kind that look like the stereotypical chemistry lab.
Unless, of course, your cause-and-effects have to do with God.Funny how we can see the invisible things by their impact on the world.
Show me how it is done. show breed two fish in a lab and get me something other than a fish.
I can post pictures of God creating the universe similarly and why doesn't that count? Because it isn't proof of anything.
Debatable, they certainly have strong social and environmental barriers to reproduction.I thought I read something recently that dogs weren't differentiated enough from wolves to truly be a separate
What scientific evidence?
I'm second to none here in claiming God didn't use science -- He performed miracles.
Cats and fish were created within one day of each other.
Um ... no.
In fact, according to the Bible, fish and cats were created just a day apart.
People who don't know, don't care and don't bother to look are notoriously bad a judging the quality and details of things.That's right.
QV please:
It breaks the DNA concatenation that evolution relies on, and shows that, when God created animals "after their kind," that God created them as separate species (or families).
In other words, He created cats, dogs, giraffes, elephants, and so on according to their distinct characteristics.
See also:
Only on paper.
...
And while I applaud your concatenation skills, your history is full of more holes than Clyde Barrow.
I think you have me mixed up with someone else.Exactly. You made a comment about scientific evidence for the diversification of primates... something that you think is covered by the Bible and therefore any evidence is irrelevant and so any commentary on the quality of the scientific evidence is irrelivant.
Do you not think that chimps, gorillas and humans were absolutely created separately by God?I think you have me mixed up with someone else.
You really to learn the basics of science in general and evolution in particular or you will forever only be able to regurgitate the nonsense and falsehoods promoted by anti-evolution organizations Discovery Institute, AIG and their sister organizations.You are welcome to prove a fish becomes a cat in a lab for me.
Keep us laughing with your nonsense statements. You are doing exactly what the Discovery Institute, AGI and other creationists orgs have conditioned you to do. You make them proud.Show me how it is done. show breed two fish in a lab and get me something other than a fish.
I can post pictures of God creating the universe similarly and why doesn't that count? Because it isn't proof of anything.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?