• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Scientifically speaking, What is the Purpose of Life?

JustHisKid

Well-Known Member
Jun 12, 2015
1,318
249
✟2,859.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
What is the scientific reason life exists, or what scientific laws have "pushed" life into existence, on this one planet?

The purpose of life is not scientific. Scientific study is man's attempt to discover and explain what God has created, and they get it wrong much of the time. The purpose of life is to please God.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Sure there are scientific causes for life to form. After all, it exists.

You would think so.
No one has even hinted
on a theoretical cause yet.
Every effect has a cause.
I'm not concerned about the process.
I'm asking what would cause the process to form?
Of what benefit is living to the non-living?
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others


That's getting better. Why would life form from non-living matter?
For what reason might it form?
It seems to have infinite complexity and amazing adaptability.
What is pushing for that to happen?
Why does it fight against all efforts to kill it?
What is motivating life to keep on, keeping on?
 
Upvote 0

gluadys

Legend
Mar 2, 2004
12,958
682
Toronto
✟39,020.00
Faith
Protestant
Politics
CA-NDP
You would think so.
No one has even hinted
on a theoretical cause yet.
Every effect has a cause.
I'm not concerned about the process.
I'm asking what would cause the process to form?
Of what benefit is living to the non-living?

If you are not concerned about the process, you are not concerned about scientific causes. You are looking for a philosophical reason. Can't help you there.
 
Upvote 0

gluadys

Legend
Mar 2, 2004
12,958
682
Toronto
✟39,020.00
Faith
Protestant
Politics
CA-NDP

Again, you seem to be looking for purposes behind the existence of life. I suggest you ask your priest (or equivalent). Science doesn't answer that type of question. It only deals with the physical causes---the process of chemical and biochemical interactions which produced life.

Given the location of this forum in the Christians Only section, I expect most posters here would identify the purpose behind the origin and existence of life with the will of God.
 
Upvote 0

ScottA

Author: Walking Like Einstein
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2011
4,309
657
✟78,847.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The purpose of life is not scientific. Scientific study is man's attempt to discover and explain what God has created, and they get it wrong much of the time. The purpose of life is to please God.
Amen!

At the very most, science, by definition, is inconclusive; and should only be viewed as an authority of things within the smaller sphere of life and the past, nothing future, for all scientific futures are speculation.

But, this is not a put down, but rather giving science its rightful place. The great good of science adds quality to life in the world, and is therefore good.
 
Upvote 0

toLiJC

Senior Member
Jun 18, 2012
3,041
227
✟35,877.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
That is a great explanation for God's "motivation."
But if we can't test out His behavior with social experiments
then we can't provide a scientific answer.

Prayer studies have given us no conclusive results.

this was so because the (taught) faith and prayer were not right enough

Blessings
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
this was so because the (taught) faith and prayer were not right enough

Blessings

That may be true, but the fact remains that prayer has not
produced repeatable results in controlled studies.

In my own experiences, God gives the correct prayer at the
perfect moment, rather than the perfect response to our
decision to ask for a response on our time table.
 
Upvote 0

toLiJC

Senior Member
Jun 18, 2012
3,041
227
✟35,877.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private

why must God always do everything while the spiritual servants always be idle?!, what are the spiritual servants for?!

Isaiah 58:3 "Behold, in the day of your fast ye find pleasure, and exact all your labours.",

Matthew 11:12 "From the days of John the Baptist until now, life is given unto the kingdom of the heavens, and the valiant take hold of it.",

1 Corinthians 3:7-9 "neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase. Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one: and every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour. For we are labourers together with God:",

1 Corinthians 4:11-12 "we... labour, working with our own hands:",

1 Thessalonians 2:9 "ye remember, brethren, our labour and travail: for labouring night and day, because we would not be chargeable unto any of you",

1 Timothy 5:18 "the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward."

Blessings
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Crowns&Laurels

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
2,769
751
✟6,832.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Mankind was made out of the compassion of God. He made us to be happy, and to be in love with our Creator. We are an object of His desire.
Why else would God make us? But we fell_ We went from being tha Apple of His Eye to sinners in need of a Savior.
 
Reactions: ScottA
Upvote 0

Crowns&Laurels

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
2,769
751
✟6,832.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Steve Petersen

Senior Veteran
May 11, 2005
16,077
3,392
✟170,432.00
Faith
Deist
Politics
US-Libertarian
And cause it's own, perhaps? Entropy is the idea that everything degrades, that there is no improvement in the universe. It's why evolution is the bastard child of science- completely alien to the logic of reality.

Closed versus open systems and entropy. Earth is not a closed system, so evolution is not prohibited by that law.
 
Upvote 0

Crowns&Laurels

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
2,769
751
✟6,832.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Closed versus open systems and entropy. Earth is not a closed system, so evolution is not prohibited by that law.

Parrots have dyes in their feathers which are shared by no other animal on Earth. Sperm is irreconcilable; the universe is incapable of creating such a complex thing.
It's not like the evidence isn't there. Reality itself is a grand, open system. And it was created by God's likeness.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Why must God always do everything while the spiritual servants always be idle?!, what are the spiritual servants for?!

I was not suggesting they be idle.
They are the only connection God has to our world.
The rest is left to Satan.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Closed versus open systems and entropy. Earth is not a closed system, so evolution is not prohibited by that law.

Are you saying that evolution is a thermal system?
Or is it an energy conservation system?
Or is it a chemical system?
What is driving or governing evolution?
Is there some known law it follows?
 
Upvote 0

Steve Petersen

Senior Veteran
May 11, 2005
16,077
3,392
✟170,432.00
Faith
Deist
Politics
US-Libertarian
Are you saying that evolution is a thermal system?
Or is it an energy conservation system?
Or is it a chemical system?
What is driving or governing evolution?
Is there some known law it follows?

No. I am rebutting the creationist notion that evolution violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
No. I am rebutting the creationist notion that evolution violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

The existence of matter and energy violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

If there is some Thermodynamic law involved in evolution, then please cite the reference(s).
 
Upvote 0

Steve Petersen

Senior Veteran
May 11, 2005
16,077
3,392
✟170,432.00
Faith
Deist
Politics
US-Libertarian
Upvote 0

Steve Petersen

Senior Veteran
May 11, 2005
16,077
3,392
✟170,432.00
Faith
Deist
Politics
US-Libertarian
"Creationists originally argued that a decrease in entropy is exactly what evolution requires, hence the conflict with the second law. This argument was used in an article by Dr. Morris of the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) as late as 1973. As is the usual practice among creationists, he tried to support it with out-of-context quotations from the writings of respected scientists."

http://ncse.com/cej/2/2/creationist-misunderstanding-misrepresentation-misuse-second
 
Upvote 0