• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Science vs. Evolution

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Cassiterides

Guest
The bit in bold is bad science for several reasons. First, it assumes that the written record is the only authority worthy for consideration. What about other kinds of records that pre-date the written word? Like the fossil record, rock strata and the genomics/proteomics data? Are you saying that we can't infer anything about the world unless it was written in the narrow time span during which human beings could write? Second, we have to remember that 'written history' is always written according to the interpretations of the author. Are you suggesting that we rely on the honesty of biased human beings whose interpretations about the world are bound up in their own views of it?

Your starting at the assumption that fossils etc predate writing.

Using your logic then, we cannot know that Noah's flood was 'world-wide' as Noah claimed. For Noah to know that he would have to have observed the whole world as having been flooded. Just because some biased human being 'documented' a huge flood that, to him, seemed global, does not necessarily mean that this actually happened exactly as he said it.

Noah was told by God that the flood was going to cover the entire earth.
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
39
London
✟37,512.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Your starting at the assumption that fossils etc predate writing.

No assumption about it.


Noah was told by God that the flood was going to cover the entire earth.

So he didn't observe it. So it's not history (suspect it wasn't to begin with seeing as the writer of Genesis likely wasn't contemporary with the events it describes).
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,435
52,724
Guam
✟5,182,747.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
39
London
✟37,512.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Where's your list?

Your link explained why these member-waving contests are pointless anyway, c.f. Project Steve.

As for those that accept evolution, a rough approximation would be all scientists minus the ones on that list (the ones that whichever creationist group that came up with this massive logical fail didn't utterly misrepresent, anyway).
 
Upvote 0
C

Cassiterides

Guest
These are based on scripture and nothing else. So tell me did Mizraim build the primative structures at Wadi Halfa? Or did he found the Aterian culture that used stone tools?
Aterian - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

or maybe the he was one of the Khormusan people

or was it the Halfan culture the he started?
Halfan culture - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

or maybe the Qadan or Sebilian culture?

or was it the Mushabian or maybe the Harifian cultures

or was it one of the lower Egypt cultures like Fiayum A or Merimde
Merimde culture - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

or maybe it was the Tasian
Tasian culture - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

or maybe he didn't come along until the Badarian culture?
Badari culture - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Those are all 'primitive' cultures contemporary to ancient Egypt.

Cave Dwellers (Troglodytes)

''In the sixth century BCE, the Carthaginian sailor Hanno explored the west coast of Africa and met the Lixites, who lived in a fertile part of Morocco's east coast. Here was the beginning of a trade route that led through the Sahara, and the Lixites told Hanno that beyond the mountains was the land of strange kind of people, "cave men who run faster than horses" (Periplus, 6). A century later, the Greek researcher Herodotus of Halicarnassus offers similar information: he tells that "the Garamantes use four-horse chariots, to hunt the cave-dwelling Ethiopians, who are the swiftest of foot of all men" (Histories, 4.183).

The Greek geographer Strabo offers a description of the Troglodyte life style (Geography, 16.4.7; cf. Diodorus, World History, 3.32-33). The Troglodytes (cave dwellers) were living in clans, had their wives in common, could go to war with other clans about pasturage, fighting with clubs, spears, and bows. They wore skins, lived on a diet of meat, and buried their dead under heaps of stones. In short, they were stone age pastoralists.''
 
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟85,740.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Your starting at the assumption that fossils etc predate writing.

And you're starting with the assumption that they don't. The difference is my assumption is validated by science, yours is not.

Noah was told by God that the flood was going to cover the entire earth.

Right, and how do you know that Noah ever spoke to God? Did you observe it? Once again, you are asking us to rely on the honesty of the authors and to assume, without doubt, that their interpretation of events was objectively accurate and not clouded by superstition, bias, prejudice, deceit or plain misjudgment. Do you understand how much you are asking us to assume? A lot. And why should we? Your appeal to tradition is unconcinving.
 
Upvote 0
C

Cassiterides

Guest
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
I don't have time to produce a long list now, but just looking at my book shelf reveals about 10, others i know from youtube videos.

You don't bother to explain a lot of stuff on your own, do you? Why is that?
 
Upvote 0

Bushido216

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2003
6,383
210
39
New York
✟30,062.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Democrat
I don't have time to produce a long list now, but just looking at my book shelf reveals about 10, others i know from youtube videos.

I note with some derision that you failed to list those 10 that are on your bookshelf.
 
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
79
Visit site
✟30,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
79
Visit site
✟30,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
Those are all 'primitive' cultures contemporary to ancient Egypt.
Do you really think that these primative cultures existed right along side of the much more advanced Egyptian culture? I can only ask you to stop and think about how absurd this claim is. We are not talking about some people living off in isolation somewhere. We are talking about cultures that were in the same area at an earlier time. There were no primative hunter gatherers living in dynastic Egypt. The usual YEC claim is that all Egyptians are descended from Mizriam. Were these primative hunter gatherers his children or his grandchildren?
Cave Dwellers (Troglodytes)

''In the sixth century BCE, the Carthaginian sailor Hanno explored the west coast of Africa and met the Lixites, who lived in a fertile part of Morocco's east coast. Here was the beginning of a trade route that led through the Sahara, and the Lixites told Hanno that beyond the mountains was the land of strange kind of people, "cave men who run faster than horses" (Periplus, 6). A century later, the Greek researcher Herodotus of Halicarnassus offers similar information: he tells that "the Garamantes use four-horse chariots, to hunt the cave-dwelling Ethiopians, who are the swiftest of foot of all men" (Histories, 4.183).

The Greek geographer Strabo offers a description of the Troglodyte life style (Geography, 16.4.7; cf. Diodorus, World History, 3.32-33). The Troglodytes (cave dwellers) were living in clans, had their wives in common, could go to war with other clans about pasturage, fighting with clubs, spears, and bows. They wore skins, lived on a diet of meat, and buried their dead under heaps of stones. In short, they were stone age pastoralists.''
If these peoples existed they lived in isolation just as the few remaining primative cultures that exist today do. They did not live right in the middle of much more advanced cultures.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
79
Visit site
✟30,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
Your starting at the assumption that fossils etc predate writing.
.
So if the fossil record did not predate writing how did it come about? How and when did the
Precambrian
Cambrian
Ordovician
Silurian
Devonian
Mississippian
Pennsylvanian
Permian
Triassic
Jurassic
Cretaceous
Paleocene
Eocene
Oligocene
Miocene
Pliocene
and
Pleistocene

Layers with their unique groups of fossils get laid down in your model of earth history? Were some laid down between creation and the flood? If so which? Were some laid down by the flood? If so which? Are some post-flood? If so which? Inquiring minds want to know. Standard geology has answers to these questions, starting of course with a 4.55 billion year old planet and no global flood. What is your answer? Can you come up with one that actually makes sense? I have been debating YECs for more than 20 years and haven't yet seen one that is not easily shown to be false. Perhaps you can do better.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
T

tanzanos

Guest
I could give you a long list of YEC's with degrees in archeology, but then you would resort to what you guys normally do (your luaghable claims of ''pseudo-scholarship'' in attempt to discredit...), so it will be a waste of my time.:wave:
Don't tell me they believe in a FLAT EARTH like you do? If yes then we are dealing with cartoon physics here. I always knew that the Flintstones were going to create problems!

I have news for you cassiteredes; If you dismiss evolution then you are dismissing biology, chemistry, atomic theory, medicine, physics, etc. For all science is based on the fundamental laws of physics and the constants that allow for the physical world to exist.

So stop using the computer cassiteredes because according to you it cannot exist!
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,435
52,724
Guam
✟5,182,747.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Don't tell me they believe in a FLAT EARTH like you do?
Who "discovered" the flat-earth paradigm? Observers? Scientists? Both?
If yes then we are dealing with cartoon physics here. I always knew that the Flintstones were going to create problems!
Not as bad as Planet of the Apes.
I have news for you cassiteredes; If you dismiss evolution then you are dismissing biology, chemistry, atomic theory, medicine, physics, etc.
I have news for you tanzanos; If you dismiss the creation event then you are dismissing biology, chemistry, atoms, medicine, physics, etc.
For all science is based on the fundamental laws of physics and the constants that allow for the physical world to exist.
The fundamental laws of physics and the constants that allow for the physical world to exist operate by permission.
So stop using the computer cassiteredes because according to you it cannot exist!
If you stop using the air that God gave you to breathe.
 
Upvote 0
T

tanzanos

Guest
Who "discovered" the flat-earth paradigm? Observers? Scientists? Both?
Believing in a flat earth is like believing that bugs bunny is the president of the US and he is alive.

Not as bad as Planet of the Apes.
cartoon physics is what made the US lag behind the rest of the world in primary and secondary education standards.

I have news for you tanzanos; If you dismiss the creation event then you are dismissing biology, chemistry, atoms, medicine, physics, etc.
I am not sure whether to cry or laugh at this one :doh:

The fundamental laws of physics and the constants that allow for the physical world to exist operate by permission.
How do you fashion flint stone spearheads again?

If you stop using the air that God gave you to breathe.
The big bang and subsequent creation of the elements in the cauldrons of the stars is what gave me air to breathe! Perhaps you could ask me something more realistic like When was the Bible written? Of course the answer is 399 years ago!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.