Science Says NO to Evolution Theory!

Jan Volkes · Aug 2, 2015

Oncedeceived said:
Like I said, prove it. You seem to be aware of some evidence that has provided you with material not known by those who have researched the Bible.

You only read and believe the people who agree with what you want to believe, as for proving it, unfortunately I am like everyone else, I can not prove a negative.

As for apologetics the very title of the thread is asking people to talk about apologetics.
Everyone knows evolution happens that's why creationists don't want to believe it, if there was any doubt about evolution creationism would have come up with something a long long time ago, they failed so they came up with ID, that didn't fly so they have now decided to say science supports creationism and turn everything back to front.

Oncedeceived · Aug 2, 2015

Jan Volkes said:
Because it goes against what people want to believe.

I've said this before but it should maybe be repeated. If you want to talk about the Bible (other than the Creation Narrative and other scientific questions perhaps you should go to another part of Christian forums.

Oncedeceived · Aug 2, 2015

Jan Volkes said:
You only read and believe the people who agree with what you want to believe, as for proving it, unfortunately I am like everyone else, I can not prove a negative.

Its not a negative but again, if you wish to discuss this perhaps you would like to go into the forum that allows this type of discussion.

Jan Volkes · Aug 2, 2015

Ryukil said:
I'm really not sure how a picture of hominid transitional fossils does not show people that there is something to evolution. Really.

Jan Volkes said:
Because it goes against what people want to believe.

Oncedeceived said:
I've said this before but it should maybe be repeated. If you want to talk about the Bible (other than the Creation Narrative and other scientific questions perhaps you should go to another part of Christian forums.

Who mentioned the Bible?

Jan Volkes · Aug 2, 2015

Oncedeceived said:
Its not a negative but again, if you wish to discuss this perhaps you would like to go into the forum that allows this type of discussion.

You asked me to prove something then when I reply you tell me I should go to a different part to discuss it?

Creationism comes directly from the Bible but we are not allowed to discuss the Bible in the Creation & Evolution section?

justlookinla · Aug 2, 2015

Oncedeceived said:
I've said this before but it should maybe be repeated. If you want to talk about the Bible (other than the Creation Narrative and other scientific questions perhaps you should go to another part of Christian forums.

This.

justlookinla · Aug 2, 2015

Jan Volkes said:
You asked me to prove something then when I reply you tell me I should go to a different part to discuss it?

Creationism comes directly from the Bible but we are not allowed to discuss the Bible in the Creation & Evolution section?

Only if it relates to creation and evolution.

Oncedeceived · Aug 2, 2015

justlookinla said:
This.

This?

justlookinla · Aug 2, 2015

Oncedeceived said:
This?

"I've said this before but it should maybe be repeated. If you want to talk about the Bible (other than the Creation Narrative and other scientific questions perhaps you should go to another part of Christian forums."

That. Someone is seemingly wishing to close the thread down.

Oncedeceived · Aug 2, 2015

justlookinla said:
"I've said this before but it should maybe be repeated. If you want to talk about the Bible (other than the Creation Narrative and other scientific questions perhaps you should go to another part of Christian forums."

That. Someone is seemingly wishing to close the thread down.

Seems like it.

justlookinla · Aug 2, 2015

Oncedeceived said:
Seems like it.

That particular person tries to change threads to apologetic threads quite frequently.

Oncedeceived · Aug 2, 2015

justlookinla said:
That particular person tries to change threads to apologetic threads quite frequently.

Always has though and always will.

pat34lee · Aug 3, 2015

RickG said:
No, it just makes you realize that either evolution happens, or all life forms throughout geologic time just popped into existence at just the right time and place that mimics evolution. Therefore, not toddy frogs, rabbits, or kitty cats or billy goats in Cambrian, Devonian, or Silurian strata.

Circular reasoning. You decide what strata you are in from the fossils found. That's why the Cambrian strata may be at surface level in one spot and a hundred feet down in another spot.

pat34lee · Aug 3, 2015

RickG said:
Really, then how did the Cambrian fossils get there? Just poof! And there they were?

Exactly. The tree of evolution is a myth. The only thing fossils show is tips of branches, none connected past species level.

Jan Volkes · Aug 3, 2015

Oncedeceived said:
Always has though and always will.

Why do you think that is?

BTW, who mentioned the Bible?

Jan Volkes · Aug 3, 2015

pat34lee said:
Exactly. The tree of evolution is a myth. The only thing fossils show is tips of branches, none connected past species level.

Why do you think every university in the world would disagree with you, what do you think you know that they don't?

BTW if you want the same qualifications as Dr Dino's store bought qualifications you can get them here:
http://www.calsuni.com/
it takes 15 days depending on what qualifications you want, a PhD could take you as long as 3 weeks to get.
All you need is money and you can get fake degrees by the dozen, it's a con mans paradise.

Oncedeceived · Aug 3, 2015

Jan Volkes said:
Why do you think that is?

BTW, who mentioned the Bible?

It is who you are.

RickG · Aug 3, 2015

pat34lee said:
Exactly. The tree of evolution is a myth. The only thing fossils show is tips of branches, none connected past species level.

I'm not talking about any tree of evolution. I am asking why we don't find fossils of all life forms that existed in all layers of sedimentary strata throughout the geologic column. If all life was created at the same time, then their fossil remains would be found together. They are not. They are found throughout the geologic column as evolution would require. You don't need a tree of life or any transitional fossils.

AV1611VET · Aug 3, 2015

RickG said:
I am asking why we don't find fossils of all life forms that existed in all layers of sedimentary strata throughout the geologic column.

If five feet of snow appeared ... (not fell -- appeared) ... overnight and sat there for ten days, would you expect to find soot from tailpipes three feet down?

RickG · Aug 3, 2015

Jan Volkes said:
As for apologetics the very title of the thread is asking people to talk about apologetics.

No it is not. Apologetics is about religious doctrine. The title of the thread is "Science says no to evolution theory". How do you get apologetics out of that?

Science Says NO to Evolution Theory!

Well-Known Member

Senior Veteran

Senior Veteran

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Regular Member

Regular Member

Senior Veteran

Regular Member

Senior Veteran

Regular Member

Senior Veteran

Messianic

Messianic

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Senior Veteran

Senior Veteran

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Senior Veteran

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency