Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Science meets political spin & popular culture: who has seen "Don't look up!"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Subduction Zone" data-source="post: 76458002" data-attributes="member: 321072"><p>I never liked Al Gore and found him to a terrible politician. Not as bad as Donald Trump, but he had the same sort of underserved superiority complex. So when he supported AGW, I was against it. And he made it rather easy to refute. If you were refuting his claims. But when I debated it on science based sites I found that my sources tended to make the error of referring to local climate and trying to extrapolate to the world as a whole. They always had the better evidence. And then when I realized that one of the stars of the anti-AGW debate were using the same tactics as creationists I knew that I was wrong. Why would one find it necessary to lie if one was right?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Subduction Zone, post: 76458002, member: 321072"] I never liked Al Gore and found him to a terrible politician. Not as bad as Donald Trump, but he had the same sort of underserved superiority complex. So when he supported AGW, I was against it. And he made it rather easy to refute. If you were refuting his claims. But when I debated it on science based sites I found that my sources tended to make the error of referring to local climate and trying to extrapolate to the world as a whole. They always had the better evidence. And then when I realized that one of the stars of the anti-AGW debate were using the same tactics as creationists I knew that I was wrong. Why would one find it necessary to lie if one was right? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Science meets political spin & popular culture: who has seen "Don't look up!"?
Top
Bottom