Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
^^^neither could Jesus feeding 5000 people with five loaves of bread and two fish...explain that one, hot shot
So, here again, you are saying that Jesus did not feed 5000 people with two fish and five loaves of bread?
God Bless
Till all are one.
no im not...I'm saying He did and Lazarus as well...here you go twisting my words again
because they are statements with a question mark at the end of you main sentences in each post...read what you posted.
Brother, please understand that I do not want to get into an argument with you, rather, I'd like to know how can science reconcile the fact that scriptures do not address man "evolving" through a process "known as natural selection,".
I take the scriptures quite literally and:
"And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul." -Gen. 2:7 (KJV)
That is not "natural selection," brother.
God Bless
Till all are one.
I respect your right to interpret the Scriptures quite literally, but I believe that the Scriptures include symbolism, allegories, parables, metaphors, and other figures of speech. The literature that makes up the Holy Scriptures (The Bible) includes a number of different genres and I believe that the shift in Genres between Genesis 11 and 12 is a very important indication that there is a shift from epic tales used to teach spiritual truths to an historical narrative. This view is shared by very many Old Testament scholars, and it is empirically obvious that Genesis 6-8 cannot possibly be an accurate account of an historic event (see my post above).
Ardi, a relatively new discovery has changed the way science has theorized our so called "evolution" from other primates (specifically chimpanzees). Scientists now are say that we did not evolve from apes at all, but only have a common linage with them. Take a look at this article:
Oldest human skeleton offers new clues to evolution - CNN.com
Kent State Researcher: Humans did not evolve from chimps - :: Cincinnati news story :: LOCAL 12 WKRC-TV in Cincinnati
Then, I pose the question...how do Christians refute carbon dating if we are to believe in a true 7 day creation?
Radiocarbon Dating and American Evangelical Christians
I have always taken the timeline of Bible as metaphoric more than anything else, because I believe that time is truly a man-made concept and not a divine idea. What are your thoughts? This even convinces me moreso that God did not cause a "macroevolution" of the human race from apes, but created us in similarity to them. This reaffirms, for me at least, the idea of microevolution as opposed to a macro stance of our own development.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?