It's no wonder you feel worn out. You're arguing against a belief I don't even hold. You claim I've rejected principles relating to honoring God, the importance of rest, honoring parents, not murdering, stealing or coveting, etc. As a point of fact, I have not rejected any of these principles. Each of these principles existed before the law was added.
I prefer to look at one passage at a time and consider it in its full context. In my mind, this is the opposite of "wrenching of the Scriptures" and is anything but "folly." Feel free to pick a passage that you'd like to start with and I'd be happy to discuss it with you further and in greater depth.
In the meantime, I noticed that you seem to have abandoned our discussion of Ephesians 2 and are now pulling texts from a variety of other places. You seem to be trying to weave a tapestry with unrelated verses without considering the context of any of them. I sense that there's much more to explore in Romans 11 and Ephesians 2 before we move on to other topics. Is that a discussion that interests you?
In case I haven't been clear on this in the past, I do not promote lawlessness. I'll assume that this clarification is enough to encourage you to cease and desist from further comments like this.
I wouldn't want you to be further worn out. Please know you're under no obligation to fellowship with me further if you'd prefer not to. I'm happy to dialogue further when you're fully rested. Just let me know.
According to Ephesians 2, in His flesh, the law must be set aside with its commands and its regulations. I realize that His death accomplished other things as well, but this is the point we haven't yet connected on. If it isn't a topic that interests you, we can certainly move on. I wouldn't want you to get too worn out.
BFA