As a Calvinist and a Postmillennialist, I have great appreciation for the passage below from Dr. Lorraine Boettner's The Reformed Doctrine Of Predestination, it has for decades been one of my favorite passages in all of Calvinistic literature.
I wanted to share the passage with some of you good people here at CF.
"...Our position...has been very ably stated by Dr. W.G.T. Shedd in the following words: 'Let it be noticed that the question, how many are elected and how many are reprobated, has nothing to do with the question whether God may either elect or reprobate sinners.
If it is intrinsically right for Him either to elect or not to elect, either to save or not save free moral agents, who by their own fault have plunged themselves into sin and ruin, numbers are of no account in establishing the rightness. And if it is intrinscially wrong, numbers are of no account in establishing wrongness. Neither is there any necessity that the number of the elect should be small, and that of the non-elect great, or the converse.
The election and the non-election, and also the numbers of the elect and the non-elect, are all alike a matter of Sovereignity...
At the same time it relieves the solemnity and awfulness which overhangs the decree of reprobation, to remember that the Scriptures teach that the number of the elect is much greater than that of the non-elect.
The kingdom of the Redeemer in this fallen world is always described (in Scripture) as far greater and grander than that of Satan. The operation of grace on Earth is uniformly represented as mighter than sin. 'Where sin abounded, grace did much more abound.' And the final number of the redeemed is said to be a 'number which no man can number', but that of the lost is not so magnified and emphasized....
The doctrine of Election taken in itself tells us nothing about what the ultimate ratio shall be. The only limit set is that not all shall be saved...
So far as the principles of sovereignity and personal election are concerned there is no reason why a Calvinist might not hold that all men will finally be saved; and some Calvinists have actually held this view, 'Calvinism', wrote W.P.Patterson, of the University of Edinburgh, 'is the only system which contains principles--in its doctrines of election and irresistible grace--that could make credible a theory of universal salvation.'...
and Dr. S. G. Craig, Editor of Christianity Today, and one of the outstanding men in the Presbyterian Church....says, 'No doubt many Calvinists, like many non-Calvinists, have, in obedience to the supposed teaching of Scripture, held that few will be saved, but there is no good reason why Calvinists may not believe that the saved will ultimately embrace the greater portion of the human race.
At any rate, our leading theologians--Charles Hodge, Robert L. Dabney, W.G.T.Shedd, and Benjamin Warfield--have so held...as stated by Patterson, Calvinism, with its emphasis on the intimate personal relationship between God and each individual soul, is the only system which would offer a LOGICAL basis for universalism, if that view were not contradicted by the Scriptures..."
__Dr. L. Boettner, The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination, pgs.130-132
Cheers.
♪ ♪ ♪ ♪
`
I wanted to share the passage with some of you good people here at CF.
"...Our position...has been very ably stated by Dr. W.G.T. Shedd in the following words: 'Let it be noticed that the question, how many are elected and how many are reprobated, has nothing to do with the question whether God may either elect or reprobate sinners.
If it is intrinsically right for Him either to elect or not to elect, either to save or not save free moral agents, who by their own fault have plunged themselves into sin and ruin, numbers are of no account in establishing the rightness. And if it is intrinscially wrong, numbers are of no account in establishing wrongness. Neither is there any necessity that the number of the elect should be small, and that of the non-elect great, or the converse.
The election and the non-election, and also the numbers of the elect and the non-elect, are all alike a matter of Sovereignity...
At the same time it relieves the solemnity and awfulness which overhangs the decree of reprobation, to remember that the Scriptures teach that the number of the elect is much greater than that of the non-elect.
The kingdom of the Redeemer in this fallen world is always described (in Scripture) as far greater and grander than that of Satan. The operation of grace on Earth is uniformly represented as mighter than sin. 'Where sin abounded, grace did much more abound.' And the final number of the redeemed is said to be a 'number which no man can number', but that of the lost is not so magnified and emphasized....
The doctrine of Election taken in itself tells us nothing about what the ultimate ratio shall be. The only limit set is that not all shall be saved...
So far as the principles of sovereignity and personal election are concerned there is no reason why a Calvinist might not hold that all men will finally be saved; and some Calvinists have actually held this view, 'Calvinism', wrote W.P.Patterson, of the University of Edinburgh, 'is the only system which contains principles--in its doctrines of election and irresistible grace--that could make credible a theory of universal salvation.'...
and Dr. S. G. Craig, Editor of Christianity Today, and one of the outstanding men in the Presbyterian Church....says, 'No doubt many Calvinists, like many non-Calvinists, have, in obedience to the supposed teaching of Scripture, held that few will be saved, but there is no good reason why Calvinists may not believe that the saved will ultimately embrace the greater portion of the human race.
At any rate, our leading theologians--Charles Hodge, Robert L. Dabney, W.G.T.Shedd, and Benjamin Warfield--have so held...as stated by Patterson, Calvinism, with its emphasis on the intimate personal relationship between God and each individual soul, is the only system which would offer a LOGICAL basis for universalism, if that view were not contradicted by the Scriptures..."
__Dr. L. Boettner, The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination, pgs.130-132
Cheers.
♪ ♪ ♪ ♪
`