I'm reading a book about sanctification by C. B. Whitaker entitled "The Second Benefit" which came out in 1910, printed by the Wesleyan Methodist Publishing Association. I thought I'd post a few items from it.
"We present the seven following reasons for teaching that entire sanctification is an instantaneous work wrought in the soul subsequent to regeneration:
1. The Bible standard of holiness is higher than the mass of Christians either profess or enjoy; and to claim this standard is reached in regeneration practically un-christianizes all who have not obtained this state of grace.
2. The Scriptures speak of "the perfecting of saints," and this agrees with common sense that the perfecting of anything must occur after the beginning of its existence.
3. The confessed lack of thousands of faithful Christians shows that they are not perfect in some sense that their inner consciousness tells them they might be, yet they are commanded to be perfect "even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect." Matt. 5:48. As ministers of the New Testament we ought to be telling these souls how that lack can be supplied through Jesus Christ our Lord.
4. The standard authors of nearly all churches make a distinction between regeneration and entire sanctification, both as to time and conditions. If we do not distinguish between these [5] two works in our preaching how shall the people know that the wise and holy men of the past and present have recognized this distinction? We should be true to our creeds, or else show abundant reasons for departing from "the ancient landmarks which thy fathers have set."
5. The experience of multitudes, who have obtained this grace, corroborate the "second work" theory to be substantially correct. If thousands have obtained this grace, we ought to tell the other thousands who have not yet seen their Pentecost lest they rise up in the judgment and condemn us.
6. The church and the world need the very best possible life and highest attainable experience set before them; hence we are justified in pressing this matter even through much opposition.
7. The Scriptures hold us accountable and command us to preach the "preaching that I bid thee." We have no alternative; it is preach the Word, or the blood of souls will be required at our hands. It requires no great depth of learning to know that the Bible does teach the "dearly beloved" to cleanse themselves; that the "branch that beareth fruit" is to be purged; that officials are given to the church "for the perfecting of the saints;" and that those who had believed on Christ had this prayer offered for them, "And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly."
6
For these reasons we conclude that we cannot be true to God, or to those who are under our ministry, if we leave out of our teaching this glorious experience and precious privilege which we believe to be God's will concerning his children."
"We present the seven following reasons for teaching that entire sanctification is an instantaneous work wrought in the soul subsequent to regeneration:
1. The Bible standard of holiness is higher than the mass of Christians either profess or enjoy; and to claim this standard is reached in regeneration practically un-christianizes all who have not obtained this state of grace.
2. The Scriptures speak of "the perfecting of saints," and this agrees with common sense that the perfecting of anything must occur after the beginning of its existence.
3. The confessed lack of thousands of faithful Christians shows that they are not perfect in some sense that their inner consciousness tells them they might be, yet they are commanded to be perfect "even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect." Matt. 5:48. As ministers of the New Testament we ought to be telling these souls how that lack can be supplied through Jesus Christ our Lord.
4. The standard authors of nearly all churches make a distinction between regeneration and entire sanctification, both as to time and conditions. If we do not distinguish between these [5] two works in our preaching how shall the people know that the wise and holy men of the past and present have recognized this distinction? We should be true to our creeds, or else show abundant reasons for departing from "the ancient landmarks which thy fathers have set."
5. The experience of multitudes, who have obtained this grace, corroborate the "second work" theory to be substantially correct. If thousands have obtained this grace, we ought to tell the other thousands who have not yet seen their Pentecost lest they rise up in the judgment and condemn us.
6. The church and the world need the very best possible life and highest attainable experience set before them; hence we are justified in pressing this matter even through much opposition.
7. The Scriptures hold us accountable and command us to preach the "preaching that I bid thee." We have no alternative; it is preach the Word, or the blood of souls will be required at our hands. It requires no great depth of learning to know that the Bible does teach the "dearly beloved" to cleanse themselves; that the "branch that beareth fruit" is to be purged; that officials are given to the church "for the perfecting of the saints;" and that those who had believed on Christ had this prayer offered for them, "And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly."
6
For these reasons we conclude that we cannot be true to God, or to those who are under our ministry, if we leave out of our teaching this glorious experience and precious privilege which we believe to be God's will concerning his children."