• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Samaritan v. Jew comparison...

A

AndrewK788

Guest
I have a feeling this may end up being quite controversial, so first I want to say I'm not trying to offend...simply thinking out loud in the form of this thread.

I've been thinking about the relationship between the Samaritan's and the Jews. The Jews always looked down on the Samaritans for various reasons but ultimately it was because they were not conformed to their own faith...worshiping in the temple in Jerusalem. It wasnt that they didn't believe in God or search for truth. In fact, Jesus had more success in reaching the Samaritans than he did the Pharisees and their followers...so could this almost be like trads and progs?

I see a comparison between the two. The trads are called traditional for a reason...not that that is always a bad thing, but progressives tend to be more actively searching out truth and not always relying on previous assumptions. The Jews were so certain the form in which the Messiah would come that when he did they missed it. Just as some Adventists today are so certain of the SDA doctrine that has been passed down for the last 100 yrs it is heresy to question it (or EGW). This is why progressives are so often condemned by trads because they are not entirely conformed to the trad line of thinking. Maybe like why the Jews despised the Samaritans? And I'm not sure it is an issue of which one of the two has the truth...but who will listen to God when they are called. The Samaritans may have been wrong on many points (and they probably were) but they listened when they were called. The Jews knew more about theology than anyone but they were so caught up in their tradition and ceremonies that they rejected the Messiah and crucified him.

So, before I get burned at the stake by everyone who disagrees, just remember these are only thoughts. What does everyone think?
 

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
What do I think? I think you make some excellent points and I agree.

I also think you will be reported and this thread will be locked if current behavior is any indication. :|

This area is no more free than the rest of the subforum. It's a complete joke.

Split the forum.
 
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,234
512
✟555,228.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I have a feeling this may end up being quite controversial, so first I want to say I'm not trying to offend...simply thinking out loud in the form of this thread.

I've been thinking about the relationship between the Samaritan's and the Jews. The Jews always looked down on the Samaritans for various reasons but ultimately it was because they were not conformed to their own faith...worshiping in the temple in Jerusalem. It wasnt that they didn't believe in God or search for truth. In fact, Jesus had more success in reaching the Samaritans than he did the Pharisees and their followers...so could this almost be like trads and progs?

I see a comparison between the two. The trads are called traditional for a reason...not that that is always a bad thing, but progressives tend to be more actively searching out truth and not always relying on previous assumptions. The Jews were so certain the form in which the Messiah would come that when he did they missed it. Just as some Adventists today are so certain of the SDA doctrine that has been passed down for the last 100 yrs it is heresy to question it (or EGW). This is why progressives are so often condemned by trads because they are not entirely conformed to the trad line of thinking. Maybe like why the Jews despised the Samaritans? And I'm not sure it is an issue of which one of the two has the truth...but who will listen to God when they are called. The Samaritans may have been wrong on many points (and they probably were) but they listened when they were called. The Jews knew more about theology than anyone but they were so caught up in their tradition and ceremonies that they rejected the Messiah and crucified him.

So, before I get burned at the stake by everyone who disagrees, just remember these are only thoughts. What does everyone think?

Hmm, fast forward a few thousand years, Jews>Trads ....Samartians>Progs.......we are again caught in a loop fighting our brothers, keeping them from coming to worship at the temple...
 
Upvote 0
A

AndrewK788

Guest
Jesus said that salvation was of the Jews to the Samaritan woman.

And I do not believe that any traditionals mind honest examination of Scripture or teachings of the church for that matter.

As long as the final result still agrees with EGW and SDA doctrine...I'm sorry but that's just the way I've seen people in our church act. They all gung ho to go study a topic but then when they find what they don't like it's like 'Whoa, nevermind! forget that!"
 
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,234
512
✟555,228.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
As long as the final result still agrees with EGW and SDA doctrine...I'm sorry but that's just the way I've seen people in our church act. They all gung ho to go study a topic but then when they find what they don't like it's like 'Whoa, nevermind! forget that!"


All things from God are in harmony, but when some people nitpick to tear things apart that are truly from God, then we have to look to see what their purpose is.

The Pharisees did nothing but try to pick apart Jesus in every way, but God had already prepared the way so the disciples, the people, and us today could believe.....
 
Upvote 0
A

AndrewK788

Guest
All things from God are in harmony, but when some people nitpick to tear things apart that are truly from God, then we have to look to see what their purpose is.

The Pharisees did nothing but try to pick apart Jesus in every way, but God had already prepared the way so the disciples, the people, and us today could believe.....

I agree with you. I'll admit a lot of it is nit-picking but sometimes there have been legitimate questions that get shut down in the church because it is straying too far from what SDA's believe.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,685
6,107
Visit site
✟1,047,686.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
All things from God are in harmony, but when some people nitpick to tear things apart that are truly from God, then we have to look to see what their purpose is.

The Pharisees did nothing but try to pick apart Jesus in every way, but God had already prepared the way so the disciples, the people, and us today could believe.....


Do you think that discussing the Sanctuary and Sabbath doctrines, the two end time truths that were considered "present truth" by the pioneers is nitpicking?

Because I certainly don't.
 
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,234
512
✟555,228.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Do you think that discussing the Sanctuary and Sabbath doctrines, the two end time truths that were considered "present truth" by the pioneers is nitpicking?

Because I certainly don't.

There is absolutely no reason to doubt the Sabbath, the day, the purpose, the timeline, we stand on unshakeable scriptural ground. Even Sunday keepers are unsure of why they push for that day now or dont even bother with God when it comes, and yet we get unsound or outright false doctrine like "you have to have every day as the Sabbath" which is not even biblical. This is 'nitpicking' of the highest order to get away from what God gives, it can't be called anything else, and just like the Pharisees with Jesus, they cant discern what they are doing......

It is like Pharoah hardening his heart when he saw the power of the divine right before his very eyes, and 'nitpicking' as he denied God's will for the Children of Isreal, the consequences were devasting for Pharoah, his family, and his men.....
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,685
6,107
Visit site
✟1,047,686.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There is absolutely no reason to doubt the Sabbath, the day, the purpose, the timeline, we stand on unshakeable scriptural ground. Even Sunday keepers are unsure of why they push for that day now or dont even bother with God on it, and yet we get unsound or outright false doctrine like "you have to have every day as the Sabbath" which is not even biblical. This is 'nitpicking' of the highest order to get away from what God gives, it can't be called anything else, and just like the Pharisees with Jesus, they cant discern what they are doing......

It is like Pharoah hardening his heart when he saw the power of the divine right before his very eyes, and 'nitpicking' as he denied God's will for the Children of Isreal, the consequences were devasting for Pharoah, his family, and his men.....

I see you didn't mention the IJ.

But if you feel that way about the Sabbath then come visit this thread and take part in the discussion

http://christianforums.com/t6502816-the-sabbath-and-suzerainty-covenants-the-sign-of-loyalty.html

Just do us a favor and read the OP and at least some of the other posts so you can see what has already been discussed.
 
Upvote 0

RC_NewProtestants

Senior Veteran
May 2, 2006
2,766
63
Washington State
Visit site
✟25,750.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
There is absolutely no reason to doubt the Sabbath, the day, the purpose, the timeline, even Sunday keepers are unsure of why they push for that day now, and yet we get unsound or outright false doctrine like "you have to have every day as the Sabbath" which is not even biblical. This is 'nitpicking' of the highest order to get away from what God gives, it can't be called anything else, and just like the Pharisees with Jesus, they cant discern what they are doing......

It is like Pharoah hardening his heart when he saw the power of the divine right before his very eyes, and 'nitpicking' as he denied God's will for the Children of Isreal, the consequences were devasting for Pharoah, his family, and his men.....
Exactly the problem. One side expresses their beliefs as incontrovertible therefore the other must be undiscerning or have hardened themselves against God. And the seeds for intolerance and self righteousness flower and bear further seeds of hate just as the Jew had for the Samaritan.
 
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,234
512
✟555,228.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Mankin

A Strange Mixture of Random Components.
Site Supporter
Apr 28, 2007
8,660
174
In the Norse Lands
✟77,451.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Interesting post Andrew. Except the Samaritans didn't have the ability to study Scripture since the Jews didn't tell them about it. I believe Jesus said it was like the Jews were only giving them crumbs. Of course progs aren't really like that. Still interesting post.
 
Upvote 0

mva1985

Senior Veteran
Jun 18, 2007
3,448
223
58
Ohio
Visit site
✟27,128.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
As long as the final result still agrees with EGW and SDA doctrine...I'm sorry but that's just the way I've seen people in our church act. They all gung ho to go study a topic but then when they find what they don't like it's like 'Whoa, nevermind! forget that!"
What you wrote is not contained in my post - it is an assumption on your part.
 
Upvote 0