• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

nathanlandon1

Newbie
Feb 4, 2010
345
20
✟23,118.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

This is all law, show me what this has to do with the Abrahmic cov, and I will eat a living frog.

Give me one verse please. Paul predated Moses, and said we are in that cov, not the one that came 430 years later. Gal 3;17.


Excuse me, but you were the one that initially stated Paul predates Moses, as per your own quote. I know for a fact Moses predates Paul because he is about 2000+ years OLDER than Paul.

I wont argue about the sabbath and the "old testament" because I can already tell you do not care; I will, however, have no choice but to respond to lies and implications thereof. You said Paul predated Moses. You say that following Paul is better than following God's word. People have quoted from the mouth of God what is expected of us, yet you argue with us like we are liars.

I have already said a multitude for the members and guest passing through. Frogster, I suggest you read the Word of God, and not the word of Paul. If you truly are Christian, I am sore for you. Please re-read the bible beginning with Genesis and focusing on the Law books.
 
Upvote 0
F

from scratch

Guest
Thus you have discredited every single word in the Bible. Not one word of it was written by God, including the gospels which quote or supposedly quote Jesus. How do you know that one is more creditable than the other. You would have no knowledge of the the Ten commandments if Moses had not written them in the Torah. Moses did not see by his personal testimony Who he talked with. How do you know he is not lying? Cause somebody said so? This makesthe Bible no different than Islamic, Mormon, Christian Scientist, Jehovah Witnesses scriptures then. So you believe a murderer?Andhow do you know you are on God's side? I really would like to express my thoughts here, however I am restrained by the onesided enforcement of the rules. Let me say that although there is much OT quoted in the NT it is not a regurgitation of the OT. Abraham can predate Moses though Yes Paul was well educated in the OT Scriptures and understood them better than his peers. What Paul preached he got directly from Jesus according to his personal testimony. I am sure that you or some one you know is in a position to contradict personal testimony.

The real point of my whole post is about faith. One believes what one wants to believe and the rest is dismissed. I do not dismiss a single wordof the OT. I believe ervery word of the OT as I do the NT. The difference is I believe I am in the new covenant that Jeremiah said God promised. I have shown via the NT the agreement with Jer 31:31-34 several times through out this forum. There are others who also do and have posts in the thousands to look through. VictorC comes to mind.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

nathanlandon1

Newbie
Feb 4, 2010
345
20
✟23,118.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

You twist my words to discredit me and prove your own words right. I will not argue with you, nor will I engage in this. Keep in mind guests and other members look at what you do and see you for what you are, whatever that may be.

Peace.
 
Upvote 0
F

from scratch

Guest
Technically I wish to know how you determined Matthew really quoted Jesus?I also want to know how (if) you know Paul is wrong (if) he is. I think it is strictly something one believes by faith. Some here say Paul is wrong, yet a disciple of Jesus places Paul's writings on par with Scripture II Pet 3:16. Yes I know and understant that II Tim3:16 is written by Paul. It does seem to be endorsed by Peter. And He (Jesus) did exactly that. Read the gospels. John 8:1-11, Mat 26:26-29, MK 14:22-25, LK 22:19, 20, I Cor 11:23-26 immediately come to mind. And so is Jesus as has been discussed in another thread as referenced in Mat 15:10-20.

You also bring up another good point tha tGod gave Israel as a nation and as a people. This does not include anybody else. It appears to me that you are arguing for judaism and not Christianity. Then you have not read Jer 31:31-34 or Hosea 2:11. Mal 3:6 is in reference to God's character not His administration. Isa 28:10. If one reads the Bible one will see a morph or progression of change. And who speciffically and exclusively were these words spoken to?
When Yahoshuah and his disciples were getting food to survive their journey on the sabbath, the pharisees tempted Him with a law question concerning the sabbath.
First who was Jesus talking to? Second a Christian is not limited to a Hewbrew. In fact there is no Jew nor Gentile in Christ Jesus -Gal 3:28. Gentiles do not become a Jew (Hebrew) or spiritual Israel (Jew/Hebrew)either.

I am sure that I left out alot and something I wanted to respond to.
 
Upvote 0

Big Drew

Believer
Site Supporter
Nov 10, 2009
1,885
540
Alabama
✟97,461.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian

Of course...for those of us who are born Gentiles...the Law never applied anyway...
 
Reactions: Bananna
Upvote 0
F

from scratch

Guest
You twist my words to discredit me and prove your own words right. I will not argue with you, nor will I engage in this. Keep in mind guests and other members look at what you do and see you for what you are, whatever that may be.

Peace.
I agree with you very much in this fact that others read these comments. You should consider what you wrote. Does not your argument apply equally across the board? What is good for Paul, Peter, James should also apply to Moses, Elijah, Jeremiah, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Don't ya think. I have always been told what is good for the goose is good for the gander.

You simply have a pick and choose argument whose rules only apply to and how as you wish and not to everybody.

You speak and say nothing. You accuse and offer no remedy or defense.

shalowm
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

7steps

Newbie
Aug 13, 2010
193
12
✟22,884.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

For some reason you think that what I am saying excludes gentiles when I never said any of the sort I am a gentile born from above through Yahshua. And the way that you are misquoting Paul is by using sound bites (which you apparently would like me to use as well). There are no two covenants that is something Paul made up. There is a covenant and a renewal of that covenant. The Sabbath was there sense the first and second chapter of Genesis.
The way that I understand it and I don't claim to be perfect in understanding until it is written on my heart and mind. The plan of redemption never changed it has always been the same. The Jewish people were chosen by YHWH to be the ones who would show the world through their lives and conduct God's plan of redemption to act and reenact for all time God's plan. To be the witnesses of YHWH. To act God's play of redemption. Showing everyone through symbolism and metaphor how to be able to chose God. How YHWH was providing the way of salvation. So it was not a burden it was an honor. Once accepted God showed them what would happen if they followed and what would happen if they rejected it. Temporarily they have rejected that task (Matt 22:1-14) so YHWH is looking for someone to fill in the gap of being the representatives of God's plan but those representatives can't come in which ever way they want they need to come to do the task the way YHWH wants it done. Unfortunately that is not the Christians as a whole it is mainly the set apart assembly of Philadelphia mentioned by Yahshua in Revelations. And scripture backs this up as a whole not one snippet here and another there. If people were willing to see the metaphors represented in the Torah the Prophets and the Psalms and realize that each law had a metaphor behind it they would not make the same mistake that the Jewish people made. They forgot the spirit and love behind the Torah and made it into a whole religion bound by rules and regulations forgetting the covenant YHWH had made with them adding and confusing it with paganism , and the majority of christians have ignored it in the opposite way by not looking at it at all and making it into a religion and adding paganism. It is sad because now with 20-20 hindsight their is so much more to see, so much more meaning. So if people would change their perspective and realize that everyone is saved by YHWH unmerited favor not by following the letter of the Law (David was YHWH beloved not because he followed the Law perfectly, (he was during this period that Paul apparently calls the Mosaic Law) but because of his heart for YHWH and he was redeemed the same way all are through Yahshua, not by killing thousand of lambs a year. And that if one man mainly Paul if he was actually saying what people here are interpreting from his writings (which I have read and reread) was contradicting YHWH then your choice is to follow Paul's Jesus and his religion or YHWH's perfect plan or redemption represented in hundreds of ways in the Torah, Prophets and Psalms through those entrusted with the task. The beautiful pictures of the Sabbath, Passover, Unleavened Bread, First Fruits, Seven Sevens, Trumpets, Reconciliations, and Shelters. YHWH's feast that Paul apparently discarded.

4 “These are the appointed feasts of the YHWH, the holy convocations, which you shall proclaim at the time appointed for them. 5 In the first month, on the fourteenth day of the month at twilight, is YHWH's Passover.

The Holy Bible : English standard version. 2001 (Le 23:4–5). Wheaton: Standard Bible Society.

14 And you shall eat neither bread nor grain parched or fresh until this same day, until you have brought the offering of your God: it is a statute forever throughout your generations in all your dwellings.

The Holy Bible : English standard version. 2001 (Le 23:14). Wheaton: Standard Bible Society.

And who are Yahudim (those related to Yah) today? I know I want to be know as one who is related to YHWH. So if that makes me a Jew wannabe then I am guilty. But don't confuse rabbinical Judaism and Messianic Judaism with Yahudim those that are related and are mainly identified with the set apart assembly of brotherly love.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Bananna
Upvote 0

7steps

Newbie
Aug 13, 2010
193
12
✟22,884.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You twist my words to discredit me and prove your own words right. I will not argue with you, nor will I engage in this. Keep in mind guests and other members look at what you do and see you for what you are, whatever that may be.

Peace.

Nathan I told you it was futile. The funny thing is that we keep on coming back for more as if it is going to change anything. I am done.
 
Upvote 0
F

from scratch

Guest
I asked you to idenify this covenant: Jer 31:31-34 and Mat 26:28 also recorded by Mark and Luke.
 
Upvote 0

7steps

Newbie
Aug 13, 2010
193
12
✟22,884.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I asked you to idenify this covenant: Jer 31:31-34 and Mat 26:28 also recorded by Mark and Luke.


Funny thing my whole post that you quoted had nothing to do with two covenants it had to do with one and the renewal of it and you still asked me to identify one. And out of all of that all you focus is on which one. This is why I did not want to engage before. Because it does not matter what is said it goes nowhere. But it is so addicting.
But by the way it is same one I said you were taken out of context before. It is the renewed covenant that has not totally been completed yet.
 
Upvote 0

Preecher

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2010
485
11
✟708.00
Faith
Christian
How many of the 600 + in the OT are we bound to keep? How do we decide which one's we don't need?
 
Upvote 0

PROPHECYKID

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2007
5,982
528
37
The isle of spice
Visit site
✟118,684.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How many of the 600 + in the OT are we bound to keep? How do we decide which one's we don't need?

We let the bible tell us. A text that has been much quoted here tells us. Colossians 2: 14.

We learn from that, that the handwriting of ordinances were blotted out. We learn that this handwriting of ordinances contain shadows of things to come but the body is of Christ. Hebrews 10:1 tells us what about in the law were the shadows of Christ.

Heb 10:1 For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.

We find this theme echoed throughout the chapters of Hebrews 8, 9 and 10. Those chapters speak about the aspects of the old covenant which was made better, and which were shadows of Jesus in the New Covenant. We find old testament priestly ministry, animal sacrifices, ordinances, meat and drink offerings and everything connected to that system of sacrifices. All of the laws which were apart of this system are now useless since this system has been replaced. What we do not see reference made to as a shadow of Christ is God's 10 commandments. Ironically, that is what everyone places the most focus on. There is one reference made to the law in Hebrews 8 and 10 as being apart of the New Covenant. It was first spoken of in Jeremiah.

Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.

God is internalizing the law here. The reason why no one would have to teach the law is because when God places the law in the heart it doesn't need to be learnt. A law written on stone needs to be taught but in the heart it doesn't. So hebrews tells us that the laws concerning ordinances and ceremonies are no longer valid in the New Covenant because the Old Covenant system of sacrifices is done away. But in the New Covenant God wants to place his moral law in our hearts.
 
Upvote 0

PROPHECYKID

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2007
5,982
528
37
The isle of spice
Visit site
✟118,684.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Here's a question for you all. Must we keep the 600 + OT commands to be saved? If you say no, then what are some of you squawking about?

It is one sided to think about what we must do to be saved. The other side to consider, is what we must do because of the fact that Jesus has saved us. After Jesus died to save me for my sins would I have other God's or make graven images? Would I take his name in vain? Because of my gratitude and love for God I will do what pleases him. It is a shame that some people believe that God actually is unhappy when we try to keep his commandments. God's commandments are holy, just and good and the man operating by the flesh would not be subject to his law and cannot please him.
 
Upvote 0

Preecher

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2010
485
11
✟708.00
Faith
Christian
So, what about the rest of the 600 +?
 
Upvote 0